toyota supra?

[Eugenics 5,000+ posts]

thats why i hate the internet.. when people speak to me like that, I cant punch them in the face

thats why i hate the internet, everyone thinks they know everything... and everyones a hardass.

please dont beat me up, hardass.

 

[JonMR2turbo 10+ year member]

N/A has a ton of advantages.

Yeah definitely.

I have two MR2s, one turbo and one N/A. The turbo is nice because it's a hell of a lot easier to make more power with plus who doesn't love feeling boost? But the N/A is also nice because of the flatter torque curve and you don't have to wait for the turbo to spool up to go anywhere.

But both have their pros and cons.

 

[Eugenics 5,000+ posts]

what years?. i

EDIT: I believe they are called the Mark II's

 

[stayTUNED 10+ year member]

thats why i hate the internet, everyone thinks they know everything... and everyones a hardass.

couldnt have said it better myself

 

[Eugenics 5,000+ posts]

couldnt have said it better myself

so why didn't you? instead of trying to be a hardass and making broad generalizations based on lack of experience and poor rationale.

 

[stayTUNED 10+ year member]

so why didn't you? instead of trying to be a hardass and making broad generalizations based on lack of experience and poor rationale.

sorry i dont listen to someones opinion and then call them a retard and then hit em with a sTFU. now Im the hardass? grow up

Broad generalizations? Isnt this whole thread? Out of all the cars that come (came) in an N/A and turbo trim, which would you take N/A? ****, you can even bolt a simple system on a 350 and beat alot of supercars on the track. Poor rationale LoL. I need to dig up that video of the crappy turbocharged focus passing a 355 spyder on an autox. I was there during my neighbors VR6 build up (GT72R/~650 whp), first race of this season he walked by a z06 no problem. What rationale?

 

[Eugenics 5,000+ posts]

How could you not like a turbo? The most efficient power to be had. Supras, RX-7's, 300zx's are all junk without them.

The worst thing Mitsubishi did was produce a NA only Eclipse.

Who remembers the Starion?

You assume that all vehicles without a turbo are worthless

thanks for the kind words. Some would prefer to have a kick *** autocross car that would go fast in a straight line than to have a loud *** 2 ton heap thats 1 second quicker in the quarter but cant cut a corner for its life. But i guess its your preference that really matters

You try to make an insult based on your assumption that i give a shit what happens in the quarter mile and have no experience racing....

thats why i hate the internet.. when people speak to me like that, I cant punch them in the face

You make the assumption that you can kick anyones *** on the internet...

hardass

Broad generalizations? Isnt this whole thread? Out of all the cars that come (came) in an N/A and turbo trim, which would you take N/A? ****, you can even bolt a simple system on a 350 and beat alot of supercars on the track. Poor rationale LoL. I need to dig up that video of the crappy turbocharged focus passing a 355 spyder on an autox. I was there during my neighbors VR6 build up (GT72R/~650 whp), first race of this season he walked by a z06 no problem. What rationale?

Broad generalizations... as in you insunuating any vehicle without a turbo was worthless.

I would take the 300zx, or the supra... i would love to have that engine kicking out 350-400hp N/A

Please feel free to tell me which supercars a 350z can beat with a 'simple' turbo system

And please do list A LOT of them.

I could beat a 355 sypder in a pickup truck if the drivers shitty enough... what would that prove about the car?

Who cares if your friends VW walked a Z06? it has 150hp more and the quarter was the last thing on GM's mind when they were designing the Z06. 650hp is useless in that car. I respect that feat on an engineering level but beyond that its just silly and pointless.

 

[Eugenics 5,000+ posts]

nothing to say?

 

[JonMR2turbo 10+ year member]

what years?. i
EDIT: I believe they are called the Mark II's

Both 91s and you're right, mkII is the correct name for that generation //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/cool.gif.3bcaf8f141236c00f8044d07150e34f7.gif