squeak9798
5,000+ posts
Banned
Number one, if he knew which amps he was listening to that right there invalidates the results //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gifHis amp comparison I believe was simply swapping between both arc amps but I will clarify it with him. He has done MANY installs and specifically told me he will never use class D amplifiers of any brand again. He went so far as to recommend that if the ARCXXK 2500 does not fit to just go with another line of amps that makes an A/B that will. He does not want to see me using a 1500XXK....
So squeak what exactly is your definition of properly testing A/B vs D if changing the amp and using the same settings and the adjusting for the SAME power is not enough? To me that IS a proper test. If someone has tried this several times using the same ARC amps then let me know of a better person’s advice to take on this matter. Maybe the 1500XXK just sucks balls and there is some other magical reason, despite it being made for sub duty, I don't know but I am listening. I need to understand why someone who would be so against class D's and I know there are others out there as well.
Here is a segment of the mail I received.
"Justin, In plain and simple English, they have no F'ing clue, most
people do not. I have tested dozens of amps and D class sub amps on an
SQ system always lack a great deal, even the Arc and it was not a cheap
amp in the least.
There are those that think an Alpine 9835 sounds just as good as an
Eclipse 8443 or 8053, there is a world of difference.
( I have owned $2,500 HUs, $2,500 DAC's, Rainbow Reference speakers, etc)"
"Testing" and owning multiple amps doesn't inherently create validity in his statements. There are many things that can create bias in his opinion. Jim mentioned a few of them. Not probably conducting the comparison another. Etc etc.
Here is a pretty good start.....
http://forum.elitecaraudio.com/showthread.php?threadid=123226
