Sub too big for enclosure?

ThunderOne
10+ year member

Member
I plan on getting two JL 12W1v2-4s in my truck. The box I can get from SuperCrewSounds.com says that it has 1 cubic foot of space per sub enclosure. I was going to put two 10s in there, but after looking into it, it seemed that a 10 might be too small. I decided to start looking at 12s.

12s seem to 'work' better in a sealed enclosure that is 1 cu ft.

The JL Audio website says that the optimum enclosure size for the 12W1 is 1.25 cu ft.

Now, is it really necessary to consider fiberfill, or is the fitment close enough? I know some subs have a "range" of fitment, so I figured the JLs would work if there was a hypothetical "range", however JL only says "this size is optimal".

If I were to use fiberfill, how would this affect the output of the subs? I heard it makes the bass deeper and better at acheiving good lows. How much should I add if I were to achieve some sort of improvement? Do I just stuff it into the box, or am I supposed to put it in the box in some sort of special manner?

Thanks all for the tips. I am a noob, still trying to learn.

 
I'd be more concerned about putting the sub in too small of an enclosure rather than too big of an enclosure. I wouldn't do that. I'd look into some 10's. I know Dayton has a few lines of subs that would be a much better value and perform better in that small enclosure size.

Here's some Dayton 12's that I think would be perfect: http://www.parts-express.com/pe/showdetl.cfm?Partnumber=295-466

 
I just bought a 500 watt mono amp, the JLs will perform fine in them. They are a "shallow" type sub, I just want to make sure it will be okay in it. I have seen 12" subs with a sealed enclosure range of .75-1.50", so I figured the "range" of the JL's would at least have a minimum somewhere below the 1 foot mark. I just want to see if anyone has experience with such a scenario.

Keep in mind, I am in an extended cab Tacoma. The cab is not very large at all, so I don't need ridiculous bass. I feel as though the JL's will fit the bill. At $100 a pop it seems reasonable. I just want to make sure they will be happy in the enclosure, or if I should consider polyfill.

 
Yeah, polyfill can make the enclosure appear larger to the sub than it really is, but seems like I recall you can only expect a max gain of about 30%.

If this is true , and the JL's need 1.25cubes after displacement of 0.035cubes, then you'd be looking at being able to go as low as about 0.90cubes with use of the polyfill.

Depending on how much power you're going to be feeding them, yeah, u may be pushing the lower limit with ur 1cube box....but I'd prolly feel okay with trying it

 
I just bought a 500 watt mono amp, the JLs will perform fine in them. They are a "shallow" type sub, I just want to make sure it will be okay in it. I have seen 12" subs with a sealed enclosure range of .75-1.50", so I figured the "range" of the JL's would at least have a minimum somewhere below the 1 foot mark. I just want to see if anyone has experience with such a scenario.
Keep in mind, I am in an extended cab Tacoma. The cab is not very large at all, so I don't need ridiculous bass. I feel as though the JL's will fit the bill. At $100 a pop it seems reasonable. I just want to make sure they will be happy in the enclosure, or if I should consider polyfill.
...you said it, not me...lol

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

About this thread

ThunderOne

10+ year member
Member
Thread starter
ThunderOne
Joined
Location
Tuscaloosa, Alabama
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
8
Views
1,442
Last reply date
Last reply from
ThunderOne
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top