Speakers lower mpg

i'm just trolling the op sarcastically. Gas mileage is fking horrible lmao. 2 mpg drop. 19 mpg from 21, I'm almost as bad as american SUVs now mpg wise.
******* engine is straining its *** off. but current draw won't really affect gas milage in the sense that its loading the alternator.. like i said its less that 3hp. might be slightly noticable on a 4 bangger but not on a decent 6.

you tried running 93? oh your from fuckville USA yall have 91. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

 
i'm just trolling the op sarcastically. Gas mileage is fking horrible lmao. 2 mpg drop. 19 mpg from 21, I'm almost as bad as american SUVs now mpg wise.
And you think 19 mpg is bad...

With 28 batteries, a 2x4 wall, 8 15's, and 4 alternators, I was getting single-digits.... //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif

 
******* engine is straining its *** off. but current draw won't really affect gas milage in the sense that its loading the alternator.. like i said its less that 3hp. might be slightly noticable on a 4 bangger but not on a decent 6.you tried running 93? oh your from fuckville USA yall have 91. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif
running 87. Toyota's dont like anything fancy as in there is zero difference between 87 and 91, i'm not running a performance or luxury car, the extra microscopic efficiency difference is not worth the extra price at all when they both are the same. I get at best 7 miles more with 91 for a full tank of gas. We californians are fked up the @ss with gas prices so it makes zero sense to get anything higher unless manufacturer requires it. Its the weight more than anything in my setup thats why i even mentioned it. Its funny how i still get better gas mileage than chevys, fords, and other gm large to midsized SUVs with no system.

 
running 87. Toyota's dont like anything fancy as in there is zero difference between 87 and 91, i'm not running a performance or luxury car, the extra microscopic efficiency difference is not worth the extra price at all when they both are the same. I get at best miles more with 91 for a full tank of gas. We californians are fked up the @ss with gas prices so it makes zero sense to get anything higher. Its the weight more than anything in my setup thats why i even mentioned it. Its funny how i still get better gas mileage than chevys, fords, and other gm large to midsized SUVs.
Man about 20 years ago they mastered fuel atomization. No reason we shouldn't be getting 35mpg except the big oil companies don't want us to know

 
the new cars are getting 35 easy. However they wont survive a car crash lol. You'll survive but not the car...
I'm talking about a truck. Higher atomization and richer oxygen +cold air gives substantial gains.

Years ago I asked the question why not use a air cooler in between forced induction and intake. Gives 10 to 20% gains.

 
yeah the dodge demon does is not for efficiency, but for performance. running a compressor to cool intake air is a loss of efficiency not a gain

 
nah, then why arent cars in super cold areas super effecient? because you dont know what your talking about
my dad Works for louisiana machinery the build 5+ MW generator units and from winter to summer they see a 10%-15% difference in output efficiency here in hte summer its about 95 with 80% humidity in the winter its about 45 with 75% humidity.they are generall dual tubro setups with intercoolers. Hes RUNS the shop and signs off on every drawing and designs the packages along with 2 other EEs and a ME. i've seen the load bank to test the generators and i've seen kvar vs engine load reading etc... so yea im pretty sure i seen it tested on the largest scale pretty much anyone will see it tested in modern day..

only more powerful units are typically large steam turbines. and hte broilers are often 120x80x80 feet for a 6MW unit with a turbine blade diameters of 6ft and super heated steam(cannot have any moisture in it or it will destroy the blades)

 
and generator units are specifically designed to run at a peak efficient rpm, cars dont do that, i would think you would have learned that from dad.

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

About this thread

Austinpg11

Junior Member
Thread starter
Austinpg11
Joined
Location
Atlanta ga
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
38
Views
1,653
Last reply date
Last reply from
Slo_Ride
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top