Should Squeak9798 be banned?

[James Bang 5,000+ posts]

Most of those that he banned are just lame attn/post wh0res anyways.

 

[faullkton 10+ year member]

Most of those that he banned are just lame attn/post wh0res anyways.

you mean the ones who make the lounge worth reading?

 

[tEh koRnDog 5,000+ posts]

THe good mods are here. Ngsm, DBFan and Drama and Randy.
I could be a good mod.

Jesus, you will never be a mod, so stfu.

 

[James Bang 5,000+ posts]

you mean the ones who make the lounge worth reading?

i guess, if you enjoy reading one word posts... such as "first" or "lulz"

 

[ciaonzo 5,000+ posts]

Got my "NO" vote in.

 

[faullkton 10+ year member]

i guess, if you enjoy reading one word posts... such as "first" or "lulz"

lulz

 

[IamDeMan 5,000+ posts]

Most of those that he banned are just lame attn/post wh0res anyways.

Not against TOS and is the purpose to the lounge. that does not validate it.

 

[oldschoolboomer 10+ year member]

THe good mods are here. Ngsm, DBFan and Drama and Randy.
I could bend over for all four of the above mentioned mods. Then I could have just a little piece of what they have. We would all be like one big pumpkin pie.

weird

 

[faullkton 10+ year member]

why not unban the SN wrongfully banned?

I'm mad.

 

[basscort2009 5,000+ posts]

not looking good for ol sqeak

 

[oldschoolboomer 10+ year member]

this

 

[faullkton 10+ year member]

first

u mad

 

[James Bang 5,000+ posts]

I personally feels that his contributions outweigh a vast majority on here put together. If anything, why not just revoke OT powers, since that's what this is all about anyways.. over some crap in OT/lounge.

 

[Fosgatepower 10+ year member]

ban the squeak! he banned my OG name for no reason

 

[J31Rob 5,000+ posts]

i most certainly couldn't care any less who is banned.