Post pics and vids of BBW, or beached whales in this thread. PM me the nudes please.

[cotjones 10+ year member]

You're a nut job, you know that right?

Insanity and brilliance are two lanes on the same road. I find it unlikely another one of your great assumptions as a bystander as to which side I'm on is correct.

Only for those not part of the elite. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif
The rest don't matter.

Because you consider yourself elite? the only way you are likely elite is in your own head. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif

Name another species that would.

Lions, Monkeys, dogs, sheesh these are clear examples The point is that human beings spend a higher percentage of their life actively under-mining one another than any example i can think of. This is very technologically advanced.//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif Now you name something for me. Name one technological improvement to human life that has not been exploited in some way to empower a certain person.

 

[lolumad over 10+ year member]

Insanity and brilliance are two lanes on the same road.

You really like trying to explain your skewed perspectives with shitty cliches.

 

[cotjones 10+ year member]

bbl fegs

 

[jmanpc 5,000+ posts]

Erm, cotjones, the whole idea of not working for money has already been tried. It didn't work. You're a dunce. And you're stupid-insane, not brilliant-insane. Those are two different roads.

 

[cotjones 10+ year member]

He seems to be the resident expert on determining assumptions. It would be interesting to be him.

How was it not an assumption? You are not justified in determining that any mans decisions are the cause of their condition but your own. (even in that case, you are likely incorrect.)

You are saying no more or less than, "I did it this way and I'm successful, Anyone who doesn't meet that criteria is

It's clearly flawed logic. Luck (or random opportunity) alone would have you in the top 2 percentile faster than your own personal ability or manipulation of the social hierarchy. Very likely many people who make far wiser decisions than you are unsuccessful due to uncontrollable circumstances stemming from countless sources, but namely, from the culture of america.

 

[cotjones 10+ year member]

Erm, cotjones, the whole idea of not working for money has already been tried. It didn't work. You're a dunce. And you're stupid-insane, not brilliant-insane. Those are two different roads.

Before calling names maybe you should learn to read.

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif I never suggested implementing a barter system. I said it would be nice if that's how the world was, after which I said it would be impossible.

 

[cotjones 10+ year member]

Okay then, instead of reciting illogical rhetoric, prove me wrong.

I repeat myself,

How was it not an assumption? You are not justified in determining that any mans decisions are the cause of their condition but your own. (even in that case, you are likely incorrect.)

You are saying no more or less than, "I did it this way and I'm successful, Anyone who doesn't meet that criteria is

It's clearly flawed logic. Luck (or random opportunity) alone would have you in the top 2 percentile faster than your own personal ability or manipulation of the social hierarchy. Very likely many people who make far wiser decisions than you are unsuccessful due to uncontrollable circumstances stemming from countless sources, but namely, from the culture of america.

In no way shape or for did I say that. I may be better than everyone else, but that has nothing to do with healthcare, you loon.

It is exactly what you implied and now you are claiming your discussion with me was limited to health care? or that I commented on health care at all? Are you sure i'm the loon here?

Then they are failures. By definition, not assumption.

I will tell you one more time why you are wrong...

The definition of failure you are referring to is based on your subjective opinion. (or assumption)

The parameters for success and failure you are opining are based on your own life and you take the dogmatism to a whole new level by suggesting that these parameters were mostly influenced by your own decisions and perspective rather than the environment around you.

You are clearly an extremely self-centered person. You are unable to conform to any idea that does not lie within the bounds of your own experience or understanding... And you allow that perspective to not only determine your personal worldview, but also to condemn others who have a completely different perspective.

I hope sincerely this is just an adolescent phase for you and you do not remain this stupid your whole life.

 

[cotjones 10+ year member]

Where in the hell did I say that?



You can say that a dozen tomes if you want. It still has nothing to do with healthcare. You really **** at trolling.

I am not claiming or assuming anything in this thread. Keep trying though. It is cute when you are mad.

Incorrect. The definition of failure is based on a subset of the population.

Incorrect again. That sir, is a shitty opinion.

Finally. You state something correct.

Well duh. Thank you captain obvious. Why would I change my views when I'm right to begin with?

Aight well I don't know if its because you are just stupid or so self centered you can't understand me but your comments have reduced to nonsense. congrats.