Pick your sub choice...

[lyttleviet 10+ year member]

Any other sub suggestion is welcome.

 

[cjjackson85 5,000+ posts]

AA Avalanches can still be had... I think.

 

[lyttleviet 10+ year member]

AA Avalanches can still be had... I think.

The problem with that was it was the wrong ohm load but now i am free to suggestions since I sold that AMp... Any random suggestions see if you got an amp to go with it... And a matching 4 channel //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/tongue.gif.6130eb82179565f6db8d26d6001dcd24.gif

 

[lyttleviet 10+ year member]

Any other suggestions?

 

[audioholic 5,000+ posts]

400 dollars or less (on the market not retail)... Some that I have kept in mind are: RE XXX 15", Sound Splinter RL-P 15", Alpine Type X 12", IDMax 12"... I am looking for SQ mostly but I wouldn't mind it getting loud. These will be complimented with Morel's Dotech Components. Amps for the RE would be the RE 12.1... Other than that I have an Alpine MRD-M1005 I would use. This sub will be going into a 2002 Accord Coupe (size reference for box) and it doesn't matter ported or sealed.

Well if I were looking strictly at SQ, Id be looking at subs like IDQ's, Koda 10's, maybe even Velodynes. But that would pretty much be ignoring output capabilities, as SQ guys tend to do anyway. The subs you are looking at are SQL subs, not SQ subs. IMO you need to better decide what you really need/want from the sub system before you chose a driver. Also if you are serious about SQ, you'll be deciding which size/type sub will best blend with your front stage, not necessarily just how large a driver will fit in your trunk. Most likely any of your choices there will be capable of drowning out your front stage anyway.

 

[lyttleviet 10+ year member]

Well if I were looking strictly at SQ, Id be looking at subs like IDQ's, Koda 10's, maybe even Velodynes. But that would pretty much be ignoring output capabilities, as SQ guys tend to do anyway. The subs you are looking at are SQL subs, not SQ subs. IMO you need to better decide what you really need/want from the sub system before you chose a driver. Also if you are serious about SQ, you'll be deciding which size/type sub will best blend with your front stage, not necessarily just how large a driver will fit in your trunk. Most likely any of your choices there will be capable of drowning out your front stage anyway.

I am trying to find a "balanced" sub.. The front stage will be taken care of so I'm not too worried about that. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

 

[cobra65427289 10+ year member]

oz audio matrix elite 15, basically a 15" version of the idmax.

al

 

[Foote 10+ year member]

get 2 MTX 9500 or 8000.

 

[Hundreth 10+ year member]

Well if I were looking strictly at SQ, Id be looking at subs like IDQ's, Koda 10's, maybe even Velodynes. But that would pretty much be ignoring output capabilities, as SQ guys tend to do anyway. The subs you are looking at are SQL subs, not SQ subs. IMO you need to better decide what you really need/want from the sub system before you chose a driver. Also if you are serious about SQ, you'll be deciding which size/type sub will best blend with your front stage, not necessarily just how large a driver will fit in your trunk. Most likely any of your choices there will be capable of drowning out your front stage anyway.

There is no reason that SQL subs can't work in pure SQ installs. Infact, their ultra-low distortion characteristics make them even more suitable for pure SQ installs than the so-called "SQ woofers" //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif

 

[lyttleviet 10+ year member]

There is no reason that SQL subs can't work in pure SQ installs. Infact, their ultra-low distortion characteristics make them even more suitable for pure SQ installs than the so-called "SQ woofers" //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif

So what are your suggestions for this subwoofer that I am looking for? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

 

[JAZN 5,000+ posts]

ported or sealed?

 

[JAZN 5,000+ posts]

meh, theyre all good. i'd probably go xxx. the 12.1 looks sweet.

 

[ax600 10+ year member]

http://www.adireaudio.com/Mobile/BrahmaSeries.htmBrahma:thumbupw: ported or sealed they are awesome subs .

 

[audioholic 5,000+ posts]

There is no reason that SQL subs can't work in pure SQ installs. Infact, their ultra-low distortion characteristics make them even more suitable for pure SQ installs than the so-called "SQ woofers" //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif

Yeah that's why you see all those top ranked SQ guys running W7's and XXX's. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif

In the output range that SQ is judged, 34 mm's of excursion is completely unnecessary. Sure there's no reason you can't use a 'supersub'. There's also no reason you need to. Now if you want to talk louder levels (say.... SQL levels //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/eyebrow.gif.fe2c18d8720fe8c7eaed347b21ea05a5.gif ), you have a point.

 

[80INCHES 5,000+ posts]

u have a valid point

80

if your going for sq why would u need 34mm of excursion?.....i thought sq was only meant to be heard inside your car.....sql was designed to be loud and sound good doing it