If you have a turd that smells.... By putting a bunch of those turds in a bag they should stop smelling.... RIGHT? NO!!!!
Welcome to the world of "it doesn't make sense" line arrays.....
Although I do agree that thylantyr has an excessively *enthusiastic* love for line arrays, he is not an idiot by any means. I cannot say the same for you, that is an amazingly ignorant statement by you my friend...and a terrible metaphor. Your ignorance of the subject is no excuse...just because it doesn't make sense to you or conform with your elitist disposition does NOT make it a bad concept. Sound isnt magic, its all physics.
If you knew how line arrays worked, maybe you would understand. The speakers all work in conjunction with each other and spread the load across multiple speakers to create 1 homogeneous wavefront.
For example, by going with 2 speakers the excursion requirements drop 50% and im sure you're aware that distortion is proportional to linear travel. The two drivers in conjunction probably have much less than 50% of the original distortion, because they will be much more linear in their paths (if you've looked at a BL curve before, you can see that motor strength behaves more exponentially than it does linearly(sp?))
In an optimal line array where you are using say 16 4-5" drivers per tower, the excursion requirements are alleviated to 6% of the original demand. (6%...the drivers are hardly moving)
lets use the RS125-4 as an example
Zaph tested this speaker to have a sensitivity of 82.65dB
-one of these speakers peaked at .5% distortion (2nd harmonic), although averaging .3% distortion @ 94dB 1/2 meter (
88dB @ 1m, roughly ~4 watts)
-in a line array configuration you can achieve roughly
118-119dB+ with the same inaudible distortion levels. (6dB+ for the addition of the second tower, as im sure most of us these days listen to music in stereo)
If you havent already guessed, the end result of using these in a line array is almost limitless dynamics, unprecedented clarity, and very little floor/ceiling interaction.