new years here.. Whos gonna order the new xxx

[kuijo 10+ year member]

could you invert the subs if u have a mounting depth problem, and for the shitty efficiency just create a huge box?

 

[Ali G 10+ year member]

Not me, not worth the bread...

 

[Feandil 10+ year member]

could you invert the subs if u have a mounting depth problem, and for the shitty efficiency just create a huge box?

that's not how efficency works //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif

 

[Feandil 10+ year member]

Even an 'enthusiast' can call a subwoofer impractical if it takes 5kwts to get it moving much. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crap.gif.7f4dd41e3e9b23fbd170a1ee6f65cecc.gif

oh assume much more than that

you're talking not only adding height for the split coil, but you're adding height for the excursion as well

assume Mms's at just retarded levels... and the old XXX was pretty inefficent to begin with

I'm officially going down as guessing 78db/w for the 12" XXX

 

[bimma85 5,000+ posts]

oh assume much more than that
you're talking not only adding height for the split coil, but you're adding height for the excursion as well

assume Mms's at just retarded levels... and the old XXX was pretty inefficent to begin with

I'm officially going down as guessing 78db/w for the 12" XXX

I wanna see 70mm of xmax //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/yumyum.gif.0556df42231b304b9c995aefd13928a8.gif//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crazy.gif.c13912c32de98515d3142759a824dae7.gif

Fok re, I'm not gonna be saving any of my moneys towards re right now. Fokin stoners need to put the bong away and get to work //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif.

 

[swc204 10+ year member]

oh assume much more than that
you're talking not only adding height for the split coil, but you're adding height for the excursion as well

assume Mms's at just retarded levels... and the old XXX was pretty inefficent to begin with

I'm officially going down as guessing 78db/w for the 12" XXX

i know this doesnt matter but in there video of the new xxx over at ROE it looked like it was reaching about its xmax with what they say was about 900 watts rms free aired

 

[Feandil 10+ year member]

I wanna see 70mm of xmax //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/yumyum.gif.0556df42231b304b9c995aefd13928a8.gif//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crazy.gif.c13912c32de98515d3142759a824dae7.gifFok re, I'm not gonna be saving any of my moneys towards re right now. Fokin stoners need to put the bong away and get to work //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif.

isn't the XXX not supposed to be out till mid jan now anyway?

the longer specs are kept secret... the longer it'll be until they have them ready to ship

 

[kuijo 10+ year member]

that's not how efficency works //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif

So you're telling me box size has nothing to do with efficency?

 

[bimma85 5,000+ posts]

isn't the XXX not supposed to be out till mid jan now anyway?
the longer specs are kept secret... the longer it'll be until they have them ready to ship

Tis what I'm wondering... either they again lied to us, or they are gonna announce specs a week before the sub comes out??? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crazy.gif.c13912c32de98515d3142759a824dae7.gif

 

[Feandil 10+ year member]

i know this doesnt matter but in there video of the new xxx over at ROE it looked like it was reaching about its xmax with what they say was about 900 watts rms free aired

that's absolutely a lie until I see specs

to achieve 50mm one way off of 900w you'll need firstly a ultra low note... likely very inaudible.... looks like 5-10hz from the video... not to mention a super efficent sub... well over 90db/w

unless they used extremely weak and thin wire for the coils... meaning lower power handling

either way I don't see that being possible...

just for reference to get the 13 w7 to Xmax it's been verified to need around 3kw in free air to reach Xmax

 

[bimma85 5,000+ posts]

So you're telling me box size has nothing to do with efficency?

He didnt say it had nothing to do with, and how does inverting the sub help with the depth? SO you can have your box and then you sub sticking out another 12" from that?? wont work in most cars //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif.

 

[Feandil 10+ year member]

So you're telling me box size has nothing to do with efficency?

that raises sensitivity (not efficency)... and it also raises the F3 point sealed...

efficency is a measured spec

 

[bimma85 5,000+ posts]

that's absolutely a lie until I see specs
to achieve 50mm one way off of 900w you'll need firstly a ultra low note... likely very inaudible.... looks like 5-10hz from the video... not to mention a super efficent sub... well over 90db/w

unless they used extremely weak and thin wire for the coils... meaning lower power handling

either way I don't see that being possible...

just for reference to get the 13 w7 to Xmax it's been verified to need around 3kw in free air to reach Xmax

Have they added new subs to ROE. The last I knew were the protos from like a year ago //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crazy.gif.c13912c32de98515d3142759a824dae7.gif If they havent changed em much in a year then i dunno what they were doing.

 

[Feandil 10+ year member]

you sub sticking out another 12" from that?? wont work in most cars //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif.

you mean 16" right ??//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/veryhappy.gif.fec4fed33b4a1279cf10bdd45a039dae.gif

 

[bimma85 5,000+ posts]

you mean 16" right ??//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/veryhappy.gif.fec4fed33b4a1279cf10bdd45a039dae.gif

are you serious??????