But it was my point so why did you guys respond to my point with different points?
Look dude, here's what you originally said:
"I still don't understand why people want to add more batteries instead of just improving the source."
No where in there did you say 'in a system with an obviously too small alternator/source'. Its implied, but we are making the point that improving the source isnt
always cost effective, feaseable, or even necessary.
I replied that sometimes its more feasible to improve the storage capacity rather than try to build a source that can handle 100% of the load 100% of the time. Would you, for example, run multiple 300 amp alts to your 40,000 watt SPL truck, while still using just the one stock battery? A bank of batteries can absorb a charge from a smaller source, over time, to output a large burst relatively rapidly. This is how it helps SPL rigs.
How added storage can help a daily driver is similar, but more in terms of cost. Drain on your charging system is not immediate, its an over time sort of thing. Someone with a grossly too large stereo and grossly too small alternator/chargingsystem can either 1) listen to their system really loud, for a brief period of time, or 2) listen to it at more moderate levels for longer periods of time, before the stereo would need to be turned off/down to allow the alt to catch up. The more storage you havem the longer the time window allows for. now add to that a person who is riding the fine line of almost having a large enough alternator, considering his stereo size, AND his listening habits... say his car wont start every so often or whatever... adding storage MAY be enough to overcome this problem.
Oops, Ive past 3 sentences, guess I better end my explanation. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/tongue.gif.6130eb82179565f6db8d26d6001dcd24.gif