Final note: As far as the whole WalMart thing, I've yet to see anything other than anecdotal evidence that they are bad for the economy. The people whining about not getting paid enough or deserving more benefits should learn a marketable skill that will get them a job that pays more or has better benefits. They are paid commensurate with the value added to the company. If they were really worth more they would be paid accordingly. Basic labor economics.
its because you don't look up the bad and don't realize what they do to other businesses. they have too much control and buying power for the small stores to compete with. if you want to dig in this area we can but essensally would be pointless.
when a store knocks down the price of most goods to where it is hard to make $ without large volume it kills the small guy until a recession hits and kills the big store...it has already happened before. when the big stores no longer sell at the volume they need they start going under rather quickly to compensate they either need to increase profit margin or cut back on stores. this happened in the 70's . alot of local small sucessful electronics shops opened after the demise of MW Electric Avenues and big stores like them.
with the housing market doing what it is now anyone wanna guess which chain stores will be feeling the pinch? i could have made a nice bet with a rather large developer except we both agreed at least either lowes, home depot, or menards would be one of the first to pull back and downsize. according to him housing is a pretty important factor in the economy (he says most) and since less people do home improvements on houses that are losing value daily it sounds pretty plausible. couple that with a falling dollar that leaves a lot of potential for a recession and with what we import, will cost us more dollars for the SAME product. According to the article i am reading about excuses why Wal-mart is'nt doing as well as they projected they blamed growth, adding higher end clothing, bad service, poor macro managment of "lower middle class customers", and the COST OF GAS. wtf do you think a recession will do? when times get tough the majority of people dont spend the same on food, gas, entertainment or clothes. you are probably thinking it sounds like this is right up wal-marts alley but it will kill their volume. not to mention there are less expensive grocery stores, and cheaper places to get clothes than wally world.
i know just on the hobby side of things the little French engines i like to run in my race cars took a 15% price increase already with another 15% increase that is said to hit by spring and maybe another 15% by fall ALL due to the value of the dollar vs the euro.
also i might add in every wal-mart i have been too the closest thing to a salesman i have ever seen is a shelf stocker with far less knowledge about the tv's they have than a salesman at BBY or even worse CC lol. to Wal-mart, rather than sell a product for what its real value is (what other stores seemingly have little trouble in doing) they cut the price to move it. Now as a consumer you say its a good thing but in reality it means they will talk a name brand manufacturer into producing more cheap junk to get the price even lower. anything high end is not ment to be sold in stores like BBY never the less wal-mart. plus if you are doing so great and making money for your share holders why would they outwordly price cut groceries, toys and electronics lower than your "already lowest price"? drop the proffit margin from 18% to 10% on a name brand lcd screen now you have to sell nearly twice as many to make the same amount. think you will sell twice as much of anything during a recession?//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif the people who actually have the money to spend will go to a place to get good service and a higher end tv.
in 2006 a share of Wal-mart stock was worth about $70, today it is just over $48. also 10 out of the last 15 quarters Target has been out performing Wal-mart.
you can say i might not have been worth what i was getting paid but i didnt get paid unless i sold something....and i also would spend the time (sometimes over an hour) to help a person pick out just the right 27" tubed tv. if you are or were in the bussiness you would know there was no money in that part of it but a customer is a customer.
you can sit back and say i am full of shit, that i am paranoid or that i am clueless because everything boils down to what the customer pays. real world also depends on how much one wants to invest and how much one gets on their return investment. unfortunately we live in the times of Haliburton, Blackwater, a government that "loses" billions of dollars somewhere in the war, Enron and a home mortage mess that is so bad and NOT monitored that the government can't decide to press charges, fine them or simply help bail the industry out well after the damage has been done:wow: i am smart enough to understand however when someone says they did xx billion in sales and profit was on target but sales were not doesnt mean you made money at all. simply means you made the right percentage on what you sold but did not have enough volume.