reading pwns me //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crap.gif.7f4dd41e3e9b23fbd170a1ee6f65cecc.gifWell the woman says he hit her.. so he had to of been going in reverse... wrong direction for a road...
im thinking that the cops think i hit the trailer and then she hit me. i guess we will find out june 25th when we all goto courtYou wouldn't be able to generate enough speed in reverse to do that much damage to her car in such a short distance. Maybe if you hit her 100 feet from the lawn truck you could do that kind of damage.
It's pretty d*mn obvious she plowed into you and pushed you into the lawn truck. If the cops think otherwise, then they are idiots.
still open and shut really, the amount of damage is pretty clearly far from your fault, and the ***** is just lying through her teeth.it wasnt at a red light, we had just crossed an intersection, but traffic was stopped
Even if thats how they see it, the damage to the trailer is so insubstantial that i don't even know why he's concerned... An 8 year old with a hot glue gun could fix that... and the lady is still at fault for rear ending you, even in that scenario...im thinking that the cops think i hit the trailer and then she hit me. i guess we will find out june 25th when we all goto court
that would be how you would win thisAll you need is cell phone records (to prove you weren't on the phone) and a single iota of common sense (the damage to her car versus the damage to your truck and the trailer).
You were stopped so you left skid marks when you got pushed forward... right?
That should be everything you need...
no skid marks, i had my foot on the brake just enough to keep the truck from moving. and didnt hear any braking from her carAll you need is cell phone records (to prove you weren't on the phone) and a single iota of common sense (the damage to her car versus the damage to your truck and the trailer).
You were stopped so you left skid marks when you got pushed forward... right?
That should be everything you need...