on1wheel01 10+ year member
Bang A Lang
Ahhh nut huggers lol. Yes any proof of that. I can claim I have a 14" Wang doesn't mean I do. But your welcome to un zip me n unleash the monster haha
well according to caco High on Bass is running a lvl 5 and is going to switch to a aq hdc3 unless that is one of his old set ups when he is running a EXOI've seen a 148.8 out of the single 15" Atmos Exo at 1.4ohm starting load on a Crescendo 3kwp - what the rise was to God only knows.
If you youtube Atmos Audio Exo, you'll see videos of the single 15" woofer in Rob's truck(he is Highs On Bass).
I dont think DB-Audio is trying to nuthug, I think he's trying to get the company out there some since there is very limited knowledge on it.
Also, the 149.7 was one 15" woofer and the testing was done by basebalz13 from Caco and CSF.net - score was recorded in the low 40's(frequency wise) with 1600w RMS clamped in an extended cab S-10.
The T/S parameters are not posted because they were mid break-in parameters that were posted. The efficiency of the woofer is in excess of 91db
That is correct. I did some testing on an Atmos Exo 15 in Rob's truck, it was before the two LVL5 18's on two 3kwp'swell according to caco High on Bass is running a lvl 5 and is going to switch to a aq hdc3 unless that is one of his old set ups when he is running a EXO
no this is a good deal a sa-8 400 watt rms sub doing a 152 on 1600 wattsit is for how efficient the sub is 1 15 doing 149.7 on 1600rms i'd say thats a good deal
You must not understand the difference and concepts of a CRX vs a truck metering? hahano this is a good deal a sa-8 400 watt rms sub doing a 152 on 1600 watts
Link?no this is a good deal a sa-8 400 watt rms sub doing a 152 on 1600 watts
Also, where did you see that score from? The only one I can find is the 4 SA8's on two Sundown 1500D's doing 52.1 in the CRX, it was not one woofer.no this is a good deal a sa-8 400 watt rms sub doing a 152 on 1600 watts