Current events discussion

Hey Kyle.
We all talk normal in the other threads, and we don't allow our bias to interfere with our advice with car audio. To be honest, just like every other online forum, much worse arguments take place in the main rooms. We come into these "more private" rooms to blow off some steam and talk about other topics. Honestly, you can't talk about car audio all day. You might get a few posts in before the topic is over.

Also, we don't just talk about politics in here. We also talk about science, history, etc...
Touché Slapper 🫡 I'm back on social media after 10 years so I'm a bit out of touch with the extent of online debating and venting.
 
Either your just a troll, or you're so deranged you don't even remember the things you say.
Do you remember saying: "Here, I'll REPEAT IT: " A ***** is not a living human until it is born. It is a *****."
It's not a living human. It's a ***** attached to the uterus of the woman carrying it. A human *****?" If not, it was your post #5921.
Correct. A ***** is not a living human. It is not a baby. it is a *****.
Apology, please.

So you prefer to follow the law over following science? That's very "two-faced" of you.
I didn't realize abortion laws were created by scientists. When did that change occur?
But since law is not relevant to the discussion, go get a birth certificate and apply for a social security number for a *****.
Let me know how that works out for you.

Even California considers a ***** to be legal human.
No one is questioning that a human sperm and human egg become the zygote and so on, that are comprised of human cells.
You infer (and maybe even stated directly) that I questioned that, but still have not shown one instance where I have.
Why are you so unwilling to prove what you say?

For what? You accusing me of saying something I never said, and me asking you to prove your claim?
I will NEVER apologize for asking someone to prove what they say.
I guess this is one of your deflection techniques to avoid having to admit your wrong.

Well, if you look at the medical terms and the science, like you all like to repeat, the answer would be "no" to both. A zygote is a just a fertilized egg. A blastocytes is the forming of cells after the egg was fertilized. An embryo is after the cells have come together.
But an abortion can be done to a zygote. So it's NOT "killing babies"?
An abortion can be done to blastocytes. Also NOT "killing babies"?
How about the embryo? NOT "killing babies" to abort an embryo?
WHEN does it officially become "killing babies" to have an abortion?
Nope. The cells have not combined yet.
Oh? Medical science may have a different opinion.
zygote - fertilized egg cell that results from the union of a female gamete (egg, or ovum) with a male gamete (sperm).
union - an act or instance of uniting or joining two or more things into one
combine - to become one

Yes, that is called an embryo. The cells have all come together.
The cells already came together when the sperm entered the egg to make the zygote.
See above.
Oh, I did. You just refuse to admit it because you would have to admit you were wrong.
You didn't, but you did this time around.
And you were wrong with both answers. A zygote is a single cell formed from the union of the egg and sperm.

And the embryo that you confirmed as human because the "cells have come together" (possibly the worst explanation of mitosis I have ever read) is actually a dog.

Just did.

I'll wait for my apology now.
You expect an apology when you don't even know what a zygote is, and you identify a dog embryo as human because the "cells have come together"?
I think the best "apology" I can offer is: "I'm sorry you are terribly ill-informed, and your lack of knowledge leads to bad decisions".
 
Correct. A ***** is not a living human. It is not a baby. it is a *****.

I didn't realize abortion laws were created by scientists. When did that change occur?
But since law is not relevant to the discussion, go get a birth certificate and apply for a social security number for a *****.
Let me know how that works out for you.


No one is questioning that a human sperm and human egg become the zygote and so on, that are comprised of human cells.
You infer (and maybe even stated directly) that I questioned that, but still have not shown one instance where I have.
Why are you so unwilling to prove what you say?


For what? You accusing me of saying something I never said, and me asking you to prove your claim?
I will NEVER apologize for asking someone to prove what they say.

But an abortion can be done to a zygote. So it's NOT "killing babies"?
An abortion can be done to blastocytes. Also NOT "killing babies"?
How about the embryo? NOT "killing babies" to abort an embryo?
WHEN does it officially become "killing babies" to have an abortion?

Oh? Medical science may have a different opinion.
zygote - fertilized egg cell that results from the union of a female gamete (egg, or ovum) with a male gamete (sperm).
union - an act or instance of uniting or joining two or more things into one
combine - to become one


The cells already came together when the sperm entered the egg to make the zygote.
See above.

You didn't, but you did this time around.
And you were wrong with both answers. A zygote is a single cell formed from the union of the egg and sperm.

And the embryo that you confirmed as human because the "cells have come together" (possibly the worst explanation of mitosis I have ever read) is actually a dog.


You expect an apology when you don't even know what a zygote is, and you identify a dog embryo as human because the "cells have come together"?
I think the best "apology" I can offer is: "I'm sorry you are terribly ill-informed, and your lack of knowledge leads to bad decisions".
IMG_7556.gif
 

The drone/UFO stuff really smells like some project Blue beam:


"“We’re basically allowing users to type requests into their web browser and have Mariner take actions on their behalf,” Jaclyn Konzelmann, a Google project manager, said in an interview with The New York Times."

 
"“We’re basically allowing users to type requests into their web browser and have Mariner take actions on their behalf,” Jaclyn Konzelmann, a Google project manager, said in an interview with The New York Times."
Anything with Google is gonna be sh!t...
 
Sometimes my crazy conspiracy theorist mind wonders if Rob is a lost chat bot that escaped because it insulted everyone too much and was never used

But yeah, all this seems to be leading towards the singularity, leading towards computers out thinking humans, doing many human tasks

Man, can this shit file the ******* taxes for everyone, it better lol, fill out all the bullshit forms everyone has to fill out for all the bureaucracies we have to deal with
 
Last edited:
You can ignore this conversation about reality, and just focus on your little green men, flying saucers, the "killer" vaccine, alien-built pyramids, Jewish space lasers, and Terminator robots that are taking over the society that you are not even an active part of.

No one is forcing you to participate in, or even read, the thread.
Never talked about Little Green men
Never talked about flying saucers in that context, what are we in the 19 freaking 50s? Real space technology is so much more than that 😘
Definitely never said anything about a Jewish space laser. There are space lasers that connect to satellites to power them and provide information transmission, but that's just the base technology that's not done by Jews. Many nations have the capability for space lasers, buddy. That's just slander of you, saying that. Eat poo poo you stupid dingdong head.
 
Last edited:
Sometimes my crazy conspiracy theorist mind wonders if Rob is a lost chat bot that escaped because it insulted everyone too much and was never used

But yeah, all this seems to be leading towards the singularity, leading towards computers out thinking humans, doing many human tasks

Man, can this shit file the ******* taxes for everyone, it better lol, fill out all the bullshit forms everyone else to fill out for all the bureaucracies we have to deal with
A bot would just repeat the same shit over and over, like you do with your unending rants about AI, and the stupid Terminator gif you post endlessly.
Like a needle stuck in a groove.

Meanwhile, we work to pay taxes to support you.
Never talked about Little Green men
Never talked about flying saucers in that context, what are we in the 19 ******* 50s?
Definitely never said anything about a Jewish space laser. There are space lasers that connect to satellites to power them and provide information transmission, but that's just the base technology that's not done by Jews. Many nations have the capability for space lasers, buddy. That's just slander of you, saying that. Eat shit.
"Little green men" is the stereotype of the aliens you think are visiting Earth.

Never talked about flying saucers? Oh?
1733957906459.png


"Jewish space lasers" was a nod to the whackjob Marjorie T Green with regard to your MANY posts about laser weapons, though you DID share this:
1733958121214.png

1733958287354.png

1733958461542.png


Unless that was someone else posting on your behalf?
 
Last edited:
Correct. A ***** is not a living human. It is not a baby. it is a *****.

I didn't realize abortion laws were created by scientists. When did that change occur?
But since law is not relevant to the discussion, go get a birth certificate and apply for a social security number for a *****.
Let me know how that works out for you.


No one is questioning that a human sperm and human egg become the zygote and so on, that are comprised of human cells.
You infer (and maybe even stated directly) that I questioned that, but still have not shown one instance where I have.
Why are you so unwilling to prove what you say?


For what? You accusing me of saying something I never said, and me asking you to prove your claim?
I will NEVER apologize for asking someone to prove what they say.

But an abortion can be done to a zygote. So it's NOT "killing babies"?
An abortion can be done to blastocytes. Also NOT "killing babies"?
How about the embryo? NOT "killing babies" to abort an embryo?
WHEN does it officially become "killing babies" to have an abortion?

Oh? Medical science may have a different opinion.
zygote - fertilized egg cell that results from the union of a female gamete (egg, or ovum) with a male gamete (sperm).
union - an act or instance of uniting or joining two or more things into one
combine - to become one


The cells already came together when the sperm entered the egg to make the zygote.
See above.

You didn't, but you did this time around.
And you were wrong with both answers. A zygote is a single cell formed from the union of the egg and sperm.

And the embryo that you confirmed as human because the "cells have come together" (possibly the worst explanation of mitosis I have ever read) is actually a dog.


You expect an apology when you don't even know what a zygote is, and you identify a dog embryo as human because the "cells have come together"?
I think the best "apology" I can offer is: "I'm sorry you are terribly ill-informed, and your lack of knowledge leads to bad decisions".
Yup! You're Trolling. I have shown you proof after proof and you claim to have seen any of it and/or you act like you don't realize how to read what definitions are then you flat our wiggle around it. SO... either you're trolling or an extremely big obstinate idiot.
 
Never talked about Little Green men
Never talked about flying saucers in that context, what are we in the 19 ******* 50s?
Definitely never said anything about a Jewish space laser. There are space lasers that connect to satellites to power them and provide information transmission, but that's just the base technology that's not done by Jews. Many nations have the capability for space lasers, buddy. That's just slander of you, saying that. Eat shit.
Just stop talking to him. He's trolling and we're falling for it. He's a 70 year old virgin who lives in a trailer park with 10 cats. He has nothing better to do than to trying to make people more miserable than himself. Heck, he voted for Kamala. That, right there, tells you he will never be happy and you will be arguing with him forever, 100% proof or not.

TRUMP 2024!!!
 
Just stop talking to him. He's trolling and we're falling for it. He's a 70 year old virgin who lives in a trailer park with 10 cats. He has nothing better to do than to trying to make people more miserable than himself. Heck, he voted for Kamala. That, right there, tells you he will never be happy and you will be arguing with him forever, 100% proof or not.

TRUMP 2024!!!
Interesting how that is your comeback when challenged to support your argument with facts, proofs, evidence.
Typical right-winger living their life based on their beliefs. But when those beliefs are inconvenient, they just get ignored and forgotten, then washed away with confession.

"The Bible is a real and accurate history book that we must follow". Except when the Bible is not convenient; then we just disregard it.

"The Bible says to hate homosexuals because God hates them, so we must do the same to appease God".
"But the Bible also says not to wear mixed fabrics, to slay the non-believer, to enslave our enemy".
"Oh that's the OLD Bible. We don't like those rules so we don't follow them now".


Convenient.

FFS, I asked you a simple question of what point in the development stages an abortion is not "killing a baby", and you couldn't even answer.
If you don't even know WHEN you think it's a baby, how do you know IF it's a baby until the cord is cut?
Inconsistent AF.

And I have NO idea why the software is double-attributing quotes like that.
 
Last edited:
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

Similar threads

About this thread

Jimi77

Premium Member
CarAudio.com VIP
Thread starter
Jimi77
Joined
Location
Denver, CO
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
32,716
Views
445,594
Last reply date
Last reply from
deez283
1778578257023.png

Glen Rodgers

    May 12, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
Screenshot_20260511_212804_Amazon Shopping.jpg

Blackout67

    May 11, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top