That's a terrible thing...because TrumpTrump already increasing oil output and he hasn't even taken office yet.
That's a terrible thing...because TrumpTrump already increasing oil output and he hasn't even taken office yet.
I actually have a biology degree and have also given him the actual definitions he could have easily obtained if he just wanted to look and he still rambles on, trolling everyone. After all, anyone who voted for Trump has ruined his life.Hey Rob.
I'm still waiting for your response to my post #5975. That's where I gave you all the facts about a ***** being human and even your pro-abortion biologists agree. I guess your silence tells us that you know you were proven wrong.
Why do you think it would want to eliminate humanity as a whole? Do you know what organoid intelligence is?Show me actual proof that validates the idea that I don’t know as much about the subject as you do. I mean real evidence, not things chiseled into stone by flea-infested people 4,000 years ago. Let me quote myself again from our last conversation about AI: 'If AI were as smart as you claim, it would eliminate humanity as a whole.' We are simply not efficient when it comes to repetitive tasks. The easiest way to do that would be nuclear war. You can’t simultaneously claim there’s some super-advanced AI and insist that it has guardrails put in place by the elites. So much for being 'super-advanced.' Also, it’s rather hypocritical to say you're worried about AI but not nuclear war, which actually has the machinery in place to make it happen.
Hey Kyle.How does politics snake its way into everything? This is a site for audiophiles. You should feel welcome and be helpful regardless of the color of your hat. Who gives a... who cares what your stance is here. Are you going to not share audio knowledge if I feel differently about gun control or where federal funding should go? That's low. Politics has divided us since day one. Let's not argue over irrelevant sh...
Old_Slapper is right on with that. This is where all the fun talk takes place.How does politics snake its way into everything? This is a site for audiophiles. You should feel welcome and be helpful regardless of the color of your hat. Who gives a... who cares what your stance is here. Are you going to not share audio knowledge if I feel differently about gun control or where federal funding should go? That's low. Politics has divided us since day one. Let's not argue over irrelevant sh...
I never once claimed a human ***** is not human. I asked you to show us where I said that, or even inferred it.Hey Rob.
I'm still waiting for your response to my post #5975. That's where I gave you all the facts about a ***** being human and even your pro-abortion biologists agree. I guess your silence tells us that you know you were proven wrong.
Not unless you voted the Supreme ticket...Are you going to not share audio knowledge
The answer to your question is literally in the statement you quoted. You do understand the difference between practical research and theoretical research, right? Because, again, this is something we went over the last time I talked to you about AI. I’ll use the same example I used last time: 'Just because there is a theoretical way to make a warp drive, it does not mean or equate to there being any practical way of doing so.Why do you think it would want to eliminate humanity as a whole? Do you know what organoid intelligence is?
That's why I'm saying maybe you don't study enough what the globalists have been saying who have been planning this for decades and decades. I can't prove what you know and don't know, I'm just saying that based off of what you are saying. The proof is in what they are saying and what is being done scientifically and you can see the agenda. What you jokingly refer to as far as glyphs and dead languages, those hold the religion of the elites, such as how the "gods" designed humanity to work for them, the globalists want to do the same, but in a computer processor way. They want to design themselves to be superhumans by merging with technology, eliminate many people, and also enslave some people.
Either your just a troll, or you're so deranged you don't even remember the things you say.I never once claimed a human ***** is not human. I asked you to show us where I said that, or even inferred it.
You failed to do so, yet still accuse me of doing it. Why is that
So you prefer to follow the law over following science? That's very "two-faced" of you.I also very clearly said that a ***** is not a baby, in response to all the cries of "killing babies".
In legal terms, a ***** is not a legal person until it is born.
In medical terms, a ***** is a ***** until it is born.
I guess this is one of your deflection techniques to avoid having to admit your wrong.And I asked you if you consider a zygote a "living human". It went something like this:
Do you think a zygote is a living human? Do you think blastocytes are a living human?
Nope. The cells have not combined yet.Would you consider this "a living human"?
![]()
Yes, that is called an embryo. The cells have all come together.How about this?
View attachment 61895
Oh, I did. You just refuse to admit it because you would have to admit you were wrong.I don't see the answers to those questions in post #5975, just your claim that "Dude! I have provided you proof on everything." of which you did no such thing.
Just did.So go ahead and answer the questions above.
How is the research theoretical when they're actually doing it? I understand it may not be publicly deployed yet, but I've seen a bunch of what they're doing in the labs and it's terrifying. We're gonna have to agree to disagree, but to say I can't worry about AI or that is dumb is dumb itself. You aren't really disproving what I'm saying either. My thoughts on this subject come from a very, very deep place. Don't play word semantics or nuances. They are absolutely trying to hook humanity up to the Internet and already can. Duh. There's a whole science behind it dude like it isn't a guessing gameThe answer to your question is literally in the statement you quoted. You do understand the difference between practical research and theoretical research, right? Because, again, this is something we went over the last time I talked to you about AI. I’ll use the same example I used last time: 'Just because there is a theoretical way to make a warp drive, it does not mean or equate to there being any practical way of doing so.
How is the research theoretical when they're actually doing it? I understand it may not be publicly deployed yet, but I've seen a bunch of what they're doing in the labs and it's terrifying. We're gonna have to agree to disagree, but to say I can't worry about AI or that is dumb is dumb itself. You aren't really disproving what I'm saying either. My thoughts on this subject come from a very, very deep place. Don't play word semantics or nuances. They are absolutely trying to hook humanity up to the Internet and already can. Duh. There's a whole science behind it dude like it isn't a guessing game
Below is a very good read on transhumanism:
"According to Kurzweil, we would soon reach the Singularity, when we would be transformed into ‘Spiritual Machines’..."
![]()
God in the machine: my strange journey into transhumanism
The long read: After losing her faith, a former evangelical Christian felt adrift in the world. She then found solace in a radical technological philosophy – but its promises of immortality and spiritual transcendence soon seemed unsettlingly familiaramp.theguardian.com