Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RobGMN" data-source="post: 8885760" data-attributes="member: 683408">Interesting how that is your comeback when challenged to support your argument with facts, proofs, evidence.Typical right-winger living their life based on their beliefs. But when those beliefs are inconvenient, they just get ignored and forgotten, then washed away with confession.&quot;The Bible is a real and accurate history book that we must follow&quot;. Except when the Bible is not convenient; then we just disregard it.&quot;The Bible says to hate homosexuals because God hates them, so we must do the same to appease God&quot;.&quot;But the Bible also says not to wear mixed fabrics, to slay the non-believer, to enslave our enemy&quot;.&quot;Oh that&#039;s the OLD Bible. We don&#039;t like those rules so we don&#039;t follow them now&quot;.Convenient.FFS, I asked you a simple question of what point in the development stages an abortion is not &quot;killing a baby&quot;, and you couldn&#039;t even answer.If you don&#039;t even know WHEN you think it&#039;s a baby, how do you know IF it&#039;s a baby until the cord is cut?Inconsistent AF.And I have NO idea why the software is double-attributing quotes like that.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RobGMN, post: 8885760, member: 683408"] Interesting how that is your comeback when challenged to support your argument with facts, proofs, evidence. Typical right-winger living their life based on their beliefs. But when those beliefs are inconvenient, they just get ignored and forgotten, then washed away with confession. "[I]The Bible is a real and accurate history book that we must follow"[/I]. Except when the Bible is not convenient; then we just disregard it. "[I]The Bible says to hate homosexuals because God hates them, so we must do the same to appease God". "But the Bible also says not to wear mixed fabrics, to slay the non-believer, to enslave our enemy". "Oh that's the OLD Bible. We don't like those rules so we don't follow them now".[/I] Convenient. FFS, I asked you a simple question of what point in the development stages an abortion is not "killing a baby", and you couldn't even answer. If you don't even know WHEN you think it's a baby, how do you know IF it's a baby until the cord is cut? Inconsistent AF. And I have NO idea why the software is double-attributing quotes like that. [/QUOTE]

Verification