Correct. A ***** is not a living human. It is not a baby. it is a *****.
I didn't realize abortion laws were created by scientists. When did that change occur?
But since law is not relevant to the discussion, go get a birth certificate and apply for a social security number for a *****.
Let me know how that works out for you.
No one is questioning that a human sperm and human egg become the zygote and so on, that are comprised of human cells.
You infer (and maybe even stated directly) that I questioned that, but still have not shown one instance where I have.
Why are you so unwilling to prove what you say?
For what? You accusing me of saying something I never said, and me asking you to prove your claim?
I will NEVER apologize for asking someone to prove what they say.
But an abortion can be done to a zygote. So it's NOT "killing babies"?
An abortion can be done to blastocytes. Also NOT "killing babies"?
How about the embryo? NOT "killing babies" to abort an embryo?
WHEN does it officially become "killing babies" to have an abortion?
Oh? Medical science may have a different opinion.
zygote - fertilized egg cell that results from the union of a female gamete (egg, or ovum) with a male gamete (sperm).
union - an act or instance of uniting or joining two or more things into one
combine - to become one
The cells already came together when the sperm entered the egg to make the zygote.
See above.
You didn't, but you did this time around.
And you were wrong with both answers. A zygote is a single cell formed from the union of the egg and sperm.
And the embryo that you confirmed as human because the "
cells have come together" (possibly the worst explanation of mitosis I have ever read) is actually a dog.
You expect an apology when you don't even know what a zygote is, and you identify a dog embryo as human because the "
cells have come together"?
I think the best "apology" I can offer is: "I'm sorry you are terribly ill-informed, and your lack of knowledge leads to bad decisions".