Car Audio Facts.

[reed dollaz 10+ year member]

Having Eclipse 'stuff' doesn't mean you have an SQ system.

what is your deal? i said i was trying to build up an SQ setup, i chose to go with eclipse. so what? why u gettin on my case about it?

 

[kicker06 10+ year member]

5. Fi pwns!!!

Fi does infact, pwn.

 

[kicker06 10+ year member]

what is your deal? i said i was trying to build up an SQ setup, i chose to go with eclipse. so what? why u gettin on my case about it?

i got my nourishment outta your angryness.

 

[reed dollaz 10+ year member]

whos to say im angry? you? im asking you a simple straight forward question and you deflect it by saying u get nourishment out of seeing me angry. ok.. so theres no real reason your saying shit about me and liking eclipse, and wanting to build an SQ setup? just to see if i get angry? are u that lonely?

 

[kickerlivinloud 10+ year member]

1: You can never blow a sub with to little power.

2: You can never have to big of wire.

3: Adding subs or adding power will NOT guarantee a rise in SPL

4: SQ is subjective

5: Funky Pups will pwnt you and every sub out there /thread!

Jon

 

[audioholic 5,000+ posts]

whos to say im angry? you? im asking you a simple straight forward question and you deflect it by saying u get nourishment out of seeing me angry. ok.. so theres no real reason your saying shit about me and liking eclipse, and wanting to build an SQ setup? just to see if i get angry? are u that lonely?

He's baiting you... call troll and move on.

 

[kicker06 10+ year member]

Oh, I almost forgot.

Mass Destruction subs ****.

And do NOT trust a man named "Tariq".

 

[audioholic 5,000+ posts]

1: You can never blow a sub with to little power.2: You can never have to big of wire.

3: Adding subs or adding power will NOT guarantee a rise in SPL

4: SQ is subjective

5: Funky Pups will pwnt you and every sub out there /thread!

Jon

I disagree with #4. So does every SQ judge out there. SQ is not subjective, only our means of measuring it is. Accuracy is not subjective. Id agree with everything you said if you changed #4 to reflect that. I especially agree with 5.

 

[reed dollaz 10+ year member]

Oh, I almost forgot.
Mass Destruction subs ****.

And do NOT trust a man named "Tariq".

is he the one who convinced you there were skittles in the shower room drains?

 

[kickerlivinloud 10+ year member]

I disagree with #4. So does every SQ judge out there. SQ is not subjective, only our means of measuring it is. Accuracy is not subjective. Id agree with everything you said if you changed #4 to reflect that. I especially agree with 5.

Accuracy is not subjective I agree but the overall sound of a system is. What may sound like heaven to me may not sound as well to you. Accuracy is not subjective but "how it sounds" is.

I kinda like #5 my self, lol //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fro.gif.c695f1f814b01c4ad99fe7f8cccadd29.gif

6: TCAB.............................No I won't even go there...lol:*******: //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif

Jon

 

[audioholic 5,000+ posts]

Accuracy is not subjective I agree but the overall sound of a system is. What may sound like heaven to me may not sound as well to you. Accuracy is not subjective but "how it sounds" is.
I kinda like #5 my self, lol //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fro.gif.c695f1f814b01c4ad99fe7f8cccadd29.gif

6: TCAB.............................No I won't even go there...lol:*******: //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif

Jon

We've been discussing this in another thread. If we want to define SQ as 'what each person likes', no sense ever discussing it again. Everybody owns the best sounding 'SQ' system possible, and everybody is an expert... just ask them. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif SQ traditionally have been reserved as a term for accuracy of the original recording, if the people who want to talk about what they personally like want a term, they need to get their own! //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif

 

[kicker06 10+ year member]

is he the one who convinced you there were skittles in the shower room drains?

i dun like skittles.

you fail.

 

[reed dollaz 10+ year member]

i dun like skittles.
you fail.

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

 

[kickerlivinloud 10+ year member]

We've been discussing this in another thread. If we want to define SQ as 'what each person likes', no sense ever discussing it again. Everybody owns the best sounding 'SQ' system possible, and everybody is an expert... just ask them. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif SQ traditionally have been reserved as a term for accuracy of the original recording, if the people who want to talk about what they personally like want a term, they need to get their own! //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif

Agreed in a competition set. For the average Joe I still believe SQ is subjective, but thats just me

Jon

 

[60ndown 10+ year member]

1: Garbage in garbage out

2: You can never blow a sub with to little power.(but clipping t signal may damage it)

3: You can never have to big of wire.

4: Adding subs or adding power will NOT guarantee a rise in SPL

5: SQ is better than spl always.