So when you wire subs in parallel, only one sub sees power at a time???No, the electricity will flow through the wire with the least amount of resistance first, then through the next and so on until they're all saturated and at an equal resistance, again in theory.
I prefer to do things the correct way, not the cheap way. also, they have fuses up to 750A.That's not bad, but a few 300 amp fuses are cheaper. Also, I would need 600 amp fuses for the 2/0 OFC
I don't cheap-out on things that matter. This is perfectly fine.I prefer to do things the correct way, not the cheap way. also, they have fuses up to 750A.
^thisSometimes there are correct WAYS.And some are cheaper/less hassle than others.
Oh, I totally agree. But how is taking the time to rig up a fuse holder to properly hold 2 fuses "less hassle" than just ordering the correct size fuse, knowing you're protected at the size you need, that it will work how its supposed to and not hoping that the jimmied double fuses will actually work how you "think" they will.Sometimes there are correct WAYS.And some are cheaper/less hassle than others.
Fawk yer dumb....No, the electricity will flow through the wire with the least amount of resistance first, then through the next and so on until they're all saturated and at an equal resistance, again in theory.
I do not use fuse holders. Also, I am not stacking fuses directly on top of eachother. It is two separate runs of 0 gauge, that are each fused with a 300 amp fuse at the battery bus-bar. They converge and are connected to the 2/0 by crimps. I'd take a pic to show what I mean, but they're currently buried under my amp/fur and I don't think this is worth tearing everything out.Oh, I totally agree. But how is taking the time to rig up a fuse holder to properly hold 2 fuses "less hassle" than just ordering the correct size fuse, knowing you're protected at the size you need, that it will work how its supposed to and not hoping that the jimmied double fuses will actually work how you "think" they will.
Your kind of right. (saying "first" is not really correct but i think i know what you mean) more current will flow though the wire with least resistance.No, the electricity will flow through the wire with the least amount of resistance first, then through the next and so on until they're all saturated and at an equal resistance, again in theory.
Ture but one has nothing to do with the other. They don't contradict each other.Again back to the subwoofer analogy. It would be foolish to say that one sub sees power at a time when wired in parallel.
They may see slightly different power, but the difference is insignificant in most cases.
They do have to do with eachother. Multiple runs and fuses are fine.Ture but one has nothing to do with the other. They don't contradict each other.
There's nothing dumb about theory when that is what happens in real life... Just because it happens so fast that you can't "see" it, doesn't mean it doesn't happen. One wire with the least resistance will take the initial current until it heats up to the point that its resistance is equal or more of the second wire and then the second wire takes current and finally both wires. It happens in nanoseconds (do you know how fast electricity wants to move?) which is why most people won't notice it until they see their fuse block melt (you think they're designed to handle the heat of two or more large fuses?) or they start popping fuses prematurely. Don't believe me? Go talk to an electrical engineer, do some research online, go to college and take engineering courses, calling someone dumb because you don't understand what truly happens yourself is blatant hypocrisy.Fawk yer dumb....
All you have is a theory...come see what happens in real life then give us a shout out when you think yer smarter than the guys doing it.