Featured Facts or Fiction

Back in the early 90s (may have even been late 80s), I had bridged mono amp. Really nice PPI amp - 800wrms class a/b stable into 4 ohms. Massive sucker. Picked up super cheap too. The muting circuit was defective on that series amps so the guy I got it off thought it was dead. PPI ended up repairing it for my under warranty. I'm sure it could have been run in stereo with some modifications. They probably had a stereo version of the same amp.
 
I will start it off. I believe there are such things as "Bridged - Mono Amplifiers." Some would say you can't bridge a mono amplifier. Believe it or not, many mono amplifiers are bridged. Here is what I would present as proof.

Please feel free to insert your opinions, proof, disproof, facts or other.

Bridged-Mono Amplifier.

Simple-Bridge-Power-Amplifier.jpg
I believe what this shows is two mono amplifiers in a strapped configuration. Two monos but as a whole they are calling it "bridged".
A misnomer? Maybe, but electrically I think they are the same thing. When repairing my 2 channel US Amps 500a I noticed that the positive wire of the left channel was soldered in the negative through hole of the circuitboard. I asked the tech that was guiding me about this and he said it was common design. He said it is basically two mono amplifiers in one case.
 
I believe what this shows is two mono amplifiers in a strapped configuration. Two monos but as a whole they are calling it "bridged".
A misnomer? Maybe, but electrically I think they are the same thing. When repairing my 2 channel US Amps 500a I noticed that the positive wire of the left channel was soldered in the negative through hole of the circuitboard. I asked the tech that was guiding me about this and he said it was common design. He said it is basically two mono amplifiers in one case.
That is exactly correct. The additional amp is there increase the rail voltage and make a more powerful mono amp. I linked the site where they discuss it. It is all the same circuit on the same board with 1 input and 1 output.
 
Back in the early 90s (may have even been late 80s), I had bridged mono amp. Really nice PPI amp - 800wrms class a/b stable into 4 ohms. Massive sucker. Picked up super cheap too. The muting circuit was defective on that series amps so the guy I got it off thought it was dead. PPI ended up repairing it for my under warranty. I'm sure it could have been run in stereo with some modifications. They probably had a stereo version of the same amp.
I miss the old PPI stuff.
 
Haven't experienced it, but if they have the same excursion at the same frequency, and are the same size, does paper move less air than poly?

Are you swapping in drivers that have a lower output in general? Crossovers different? Higher LF dropoff below a certain threshold?
More excursion does not mean you will have more bass. Excursion is desired if you want to feel the bass.
 
True... I have often wondered at what size and mechanical limits does a subwoofer become too slow to keep up with music?
A lot of people believe it takes excursion to make loud hard-hitting bass. It does not. Power, speaker design, and the box determines how loud and hard the bass will hit. Excursion is only nice because it allows us to feel the pressure of the bass.
 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

ThxOne

Premium Member
Staff Member
Thread starter
ThxOne
Joined
Location
The United States of America
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
121
Views
8,332
Last reply date
Last reply from
Old_Slapper
IMG_20260515_202650612_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 15, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260515_202732887_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 15, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top