Two things here...if you are thinking that you can get 350hp at the crank on the Celica, I am sure you can, but you won't get that cheaply. It's going to cost SEVERAL thousands of dollars to get that. If someone else were to spend HALF of that to beef up an LT1 or LS1, they would get alot more than 400 hp at the crank and even with the weight diff it would be tough to beat. The old question comes into play...why spend twice as much on a 4 banger as you could on a V-8 and still not be as fast?Originally posted by DiamondAudioFan i figured out what the celica would be making @ the crank, and it is around 350 crank HP. That much HP in a lighter car, your car is prob. making around 350-380 HP crank, in a heavier car.
I cannot remember which month of Sport Compact Car that they had a turbocharged matrix, it was makin around 270 to the wheels w/ just the turbo kit and exhaust, spun the tires through 1st 2nd and 3rd gears, ran the q/m in around 13 secs. And the Matrix is much heavier than the Celica. Yes, the T/A is fast, but then again the car that i am planning to make will be faster.
Originally posted by DiamondAudioFan I'm talking about the Matrix/Celica VVTL-i engine, the 180 HP 1.8 liter engine. And the only upgrades to the Matrix were, a complete turbo kit, (around 4 g's) and a greddy exhaust (6-700 bucks). and rims.. but i don't consider those upgrades.
yes, it is expensive, but it is cool, cooler than beefing up a V-8 imo. I have abs. nothing against V-8 performance, i'd just rather have a turbo, or maybe a supercharged 4 banger.
Ok man stop it please stop it. Your gonna give me a hard-on and my fiance is gone for a few days. LOLOriginally posted by Hellrazor Man, there nothing like hearing a good ol' 350 with a Paxton on it, whining and all, like it's a jet fixing to take off! Just gives me goosebumps thinking about it! //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif