that only implies that they should raise the tax on guns.They make more than 15 times the amount by taxing cigarettes instead of guns.
Forming your own interpretation FTL.It's just sad that republicans would rather give pets health care instead of people.
//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gifDude, Scooby has hip displasia. You know how expensive that shit is? I hope this becomes reality.
Fuk g-ma, she can get on medicaid.
x2Forming your own interpretation FTL.
I like my dog more than my g-ma, I have a strange liking for this legislation, but only if they pull the money to fund it from medicareDude, Scooby has hip displasia. You know how expensive that shit is? I hope this becomes reality.
Fuk g-ma, she can get on medicaid.
Sept the average smoker spends WAY more on Cigarettes a year than guns.that only implies that they should raise the tax on guns.
Thanks for pointing out your second huge fail in this thread.
Just because smokers spend more, doesnt mean gun owners shouldnt pay a tax. They both cost the public money and kill people, both should be taxed.Sept the average smoker spends WAY more on Cigarettes a year than guns.
lets say you are a light smoker and average about a pack every 2 days. You are still paying about $800-$900 bucks a year for your cigarette habit.
Its easy to obtain a gun for less than 900$ and you don't usually buy a gun each year.
So the fact that there are much higher tax revenues on cigarettes than guns is kinda obvious and the way it should be. It doesn't meant gun taxes should be raised.
yet you post.. dumb ***..your far left trolling attempts grow tiring....
You get called that because...and why is it "far left" and a "trolling attempt"?
And the fact that you only choose to post up your negative opinions and concerns for one of the political parties. I don't think anyone expects an unbiased opinion from you.stupid republicans