why that was nice

[mcsoul 10+ year member]

Who are these mythical people with no access to health care in the US?

 

[AlterEgo99 5,000+ posts]

Faulky is a...

LEFTY TROLL

Please, don't feed the trolls. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif

 

[KyleBechtold 5,000+ posts]

these are all Lies.. everyone knows faulkton is unemployed

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

Scientists in Israel have successfully fabricated blood and saliva samples containing DNA, potentially undercutting what has been considered key evidence in the conviction or exoneration in crime cases, the New York Times reported.
According to the newspaper, the scientists also demonstrated that if they had access to a DNA profile in a database, they could construct a sample of DNA to match that profile without obtaining any tissue from that person.

"Any biology undergraduate could perform this,” said Dr. Dan Frumkin, lead author of the paper, which is published online in the journal Genetics.

The paper asserts that while DNA analysis has become a centerpiece of law enforcement, the possibility that such evidence can be faked has not been considered.

"This is potentially huge news in the world of criminal justice, which hasn’t yet even fully had the time to embrace DNA for all of its uses," said CBS News legal analyst Andrew Cohen. "And I suspect it won’t be long before defense attorneys are using this study to undercut DNA analysis and conclusions in cases all over the country."

"This is potentially terrible news for prosecutors and police and the military and all sorts of industries that use DNA testing to confirm or find information," Cohen adds. "As the paper’s author says, 'You can now just engineer a crime scene.' Good news for crime dramas on television but not so much to the criminal justice system."

"It’ll be interesting to see how the legal world reacts to it and whether this study will be embraced or scorned by DNA experts here in the States," Cohen said. "But you can be sure that before too long DNA evidence in criminal cases all over will be challenged based upon these findings."

not that i could see any police force being this corrupt

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif

 

[DB-Audio 10+ year member]

wow technology these days

 

[Johnny Drama 5,000+ posts]

I bet the Israelies are lying.

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

I bet the Israelies are lying.

lets examine this.

Lots of Jews are lawyers. Lawyers will make millions fighting cases using "the DNA was faked" argument. Jews like money.

very plausible Johnny..

 

[you you you 10+ year member]

man that shish crazy

 

[Johnny Drama 5,000+ posts]

lets examine this.
Lots of Jews are lawyers. Lawyers will make millions fighting cases using "the DNA was faked" argument. Jews like money.

very plausible Johnny..

Its jewish bro.

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

lolgentilesmad

 

[Bhhong 10+ year member]

where do u seriously just see all these crazy news clippings I can understand I watch the daily news here maybe some top headliner national stories? You seriously post one every hour....hahaha but i must admit fun to read and responses always comedic lol

 

[snoopdan 5,000+ posts]

This was inevitable. clearly if you can replicate DNA and engineer DNA this is possible.

 

[Rmsanger 10+ year member]

technically they are within the law and are exercising their constitutional rights as currently written! If the likes of Palosi can get her greesey lib fingers in there, it would be changed in a heartbeat.

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

her greesey lib fingers

you dont think republicans are greasy too?

 

[WHATJUSTHAPPENd 10+ year member]

if they did this to bush he would have had them arrested and no one would have said shit.
If Obama had them arrested he would be lynched.

Racist?

This statement doesn't seem a fair or correct statement.

If you want to protect the president don't put him on public property. Private property can prohibit the bearing of arms.

While the gun rights activists were clearly out of line and foolish, they were technically legally justified in their actions.