why that was nice

[dragnix 5,000+ posts]

i'd only do it if the roomate won't swallow //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

i figure its an all or nothing type deal.

It would probably be more awkward (for me at least) to just go for it rather than get caught trying to hide it.

Probably wouldn't be for the roommate.. just going for it would probably be way more awkward for them... but i don't care are about them really.

Not sure i could actually just go for it..

just saying.

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

i will be sure to make a thread about it when i get there and figure out what i'll do.

 

[95ZJ 10+ year member]

Going for it with them in the room at all?

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

thanks for the helpful advice.

 

[WhoSayWho? 5,000+ posts]

I think that Asian boy was right, you are going to spoil the trip for everyone.

 

[95ZJ 10+ year member]

 

[dragnix 5,000+ posts]

shower option is out

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

I think that Asian boy was right, you are going to spoil the trip for everyone.

how dare you say something like that.

Im pretty sure i will be a unique cultural experience for everyone who is lucky enough to meet me.

 

[Steven206Seattl 10+ year member]

LOL. It takes too long in the shower and people would get suspicious anyways.

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

People arrested for serious crimes in South Dakota in the future will have to provide DNA samples.
Existing state law already requires DNA samples from those convicted of felonies, violent crimes and *** offenses.

The new law goes one step further by mandating DNA from people at the time of their arrests, prior to conviction, acquittal or dismissal of charges.

Saliva swabs are commonly used to obtain DNA samples for analysis.

http://www.keloland.com/NewsDetail6162.cfm?Id=0,71286

So does the public good that could possibly come from this worth the potential cost?

I personally think its really frightening.

 

[slick rick 10+ year member]

wow...there will be some litigation on this issue for sure.

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

it really bothers me.

I cant believe it they have the right to collect DNA and add it to the database before a conviction. I can understand after conviction, but before!?

what if the charges are dropped?

You're still in the system

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crap.gif.7f4dd41e3e9b23fbd170a1ee6f65cecc.gif

 

[3kracing 10+ year member]

Honestly I don't think its a bad idea (maybe its because my dads a forensic scientist, and is head of a company that would benefit from this) but anyways, DNA can provide so many things, its kind of just like getting finger printed when you're getting processed in jail. Just like some parents get their kids DNA incase their child ever gets kidnapped so that they can identify them if they are killed. Same for soldiers.

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

they can just dream up charges knowing full well they will be dropped, just to get your DNA.