why that was nice

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

i really dont care that i am probably not quite as retard as fatryan is, i mostly just wanted to give him a forum to express his abilities.

 

[snova031]

You're a ****ing idiot if you feel as strong as you do on the subject of physics being that much more difficult then econ/finance..

 

[fatryan 5,000+ posts]

i'm waiting for you to explain what the big bang has to do with jewdism being the worlds first religion.
I know what the tiny hamster in your head thinks already, but everyone else might not.

Enlighten them please.

theories of the beginning of time:

A.big bang

B.creationism

C.yada yada yada

etc.

you believe A i believe B

/story

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

no, it implys that were equally as dumb but that he wanted to be clever and put that last little bit on to make himself look good.

Maybe that's what it means to someone who can't read.

 

[JimJ 5,000+ posts]

oh and your ABA are? thats really SOOO much better than a 3.0 i guess. anyone in their right mind would say physics or any science for that matter is harder than econ or finance. imo, econ is a ****ing joke and i cant even believe its a major sometimes. seems like one of those things you should just go to trade school for...like being a mechanic

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/hilarious.gif.02a037aad04aa96f19982b298a3d70a8.gif

I wonder how well you'll do in industry, with an attitude like that...

I know plenty of people that have horrendous spelling/grammar skills, but manage to pull things together when they have to. But without being able to read and absorb information, communicate effectively with other people...what exactly do you bring to the table?

 

[fatryan 5,000+ posts]

How is physics so much harder than econ or finance? I am thinking you are not knowing what it is.

maybe you find it hard, but i dont think it is. ive never had grad level econ or finance, but im sure youve never had upper level physics either //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif

 

[smd4life 5,000+ posts]

my pecker is smarter than both you guys...

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

theories of the beginning of time:A.big bang

B.creationism

C.yada yada yada

etc.

you believe A i believe B

/story

So you don't believe in like carbon dating at all?

Just want to be clear on this.

 

[fatryan 5,000+ posts]

I do agree that on an undergrad level at "common" programs, phsyics is much much more math intensive than econ.
On the graduate level, we are both working the same differential equations.

theres FAAAAR more to grad level physics then dif eq lol much much harder stuff.

 

[fatryan 5,000+ posts]

So you don't believe in like carbon dating at all?

Just want to be clear on this.

are you serious? theyve already found flaws in carbon dating. you do know that right?

 

[fatryan 5,000+ posts]

No, but we have engineers who have PEs who try to get their MBAs to seem more "well rounded" and have troubles with some of the more difficult econ/finance subjects. I would say they are somewhat equivalent in level of difficulty.
But you must also compare programs and how much a particular school focuses on its programs....and futhermore whether the program is more math based or theory based.

i can agree that at the grad level they both are very challenging. but undergrad, id def say physics is much harder than econ. my friend graduated with an econ degree and i loathed to have the work load she did. she never did shit.

but whatever. theres really no point in arguing this b/c its like comparing apples to oranges. and we're clearly in 2 different boats.

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

are you serious? theyve already found flaws in carbon dating. you do know that right?

I'm not up on scientific dating technology, but i want to know if you believe in any scientific dating system?

Is any scientific method for dating objects reliable in the sense that it can at least tell which of two objects is the oldest?

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

or is it all hocus pocus?

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

You should have seen this coming a long time ago.. i did.. that's why i said i probably shouldn't do this..

but i was going to anyway..

 

[fatryan 5,000+ posts]

I'm not up on scientific dating technology, but i want to know if you believe in any scientific dating system?
Is any scientific method for dating objects reliable in the sense that it can at least tell which of two objects is the oldest?

i believe some do have some big problems. the farther back in time you try to date, the larger the margin of error.