duh what's the word "the" mean?
Umm... I hardly think that the pollution that "we" create is significant enough to do shit... Think of a volcano... Think of how many volcanoes have erupted... That alone is FAR more pollution then we have created...well i personally dont think global warming is a myth... but as stated above it is a cycle - i think we're just helping the process speed up //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/wink.gif.608e3ea05f1a9f98611af0861652f8fb.gif how could we not be with all this pollution
but planet earth will soon teach the human race a lesson... if a nuclear war doesnt kill us all first
i'm pretty sure your life is going to be terrible.Well, I do think that my life will be fine (due to blind luck mostly) but the rest of the world is going to fvck itself over.
i think if there was really a dramatic climate change it would lead to a nuclear war.Umm... I hardly think that the pollution that "we" create is significant enough to do shit... Think of a volcano... Think of how many volcanoes have erupted... That alone is FAR more pollution then we have created...
But you seriously think that "we" would die out in an "ice age" I think not... A major blow to the population, yes.. Kill off humans? no....
Haha. You're ****ing retarded.. Why Don't you find something that is actually difficult to comprehend? Does that make you feel smart? Posting some opinion based articale and say it's above peoples heads??? Not really... Shit liek that is pretty easy to "decipher".... Now if you find some article on biology that is "fact based" maybe then it would be possible to be over peoples head...I dont really agree or disagree with the politics, I just thought it was interesting and above most of your heads.
http://www.newstatesman.com/200801030023what's the title of the article? what's the point of the article? To me it just seems like the author is pointing out the general public's hypocrisy with vague, unpolled examples. Where's the data to support this author's findings? how did he/she come to these conclusions if not scientifically (i.e. large scale polls, etc).