basically you are saying those who start off with an involved father have a big advantage over those with no patriarchal support.
same reason I am.I'm still not sure why i am sitting here posting instead of working on one of the various assignments i need to complete.
Probably because my dad isn't around.
If anything, the decreasing significance of a father figure as one "approaches the finish line", as you put it, would indicate an inverse relationship where importance of a father figure is increasingly important in the 'start of the race'.But as you approach "the finish line", the role of the father becomes irrelevant, except for possible employement opportunities. But as far as the child taking advantage of government programs designed to facilitate excellence, no, the father is not important.
However, all I have is my own personal experience to back my claim. I do not know how those less motivated react.
My little brother may be an excellent case study....He could care less about anything in life besides watching television. Money, power, and *** are meaningless to him. He did quite poorly in school. Perhaps if he had a motivating parent, he would have done better or strived to achieve more.
I could buy that....If anything, the decreasing significance of a father figure as one "approaches the finish line", as you put it, would indicate an inverse relationship where importance of a father figure is increasingly important in the 'start of the race'.
fair enough...oh, and i am also wasting time until my next class starts.
I have about 4 more minutes.