You certainly don't have the problem of looking intellectual.every post i have ever read from faulkton seems to have a tendency to be trying to make him look somewhat intellectual.
not getting into this- but i must say.. he doesnt NEED to survive "when real men put food on the table" we are LONG past that stage. why the "what ifs"? that is the sign of a weak argumentYour not verry intelligent are you. At least the wild animals have a chance to survive, unlike the domestcated animals that are shot in the head, in a pen so you can have your big mac. As a hunter and outdoorsman, I am troubled by your warped sense of reality. No doubt instilled upon you by your liberal upbringing. Hunters support natural habitat through licence fees and organizations like ducks unlimited. Thay have saved thousands of acres of wetlands so animals can live and breed. People like you wouldnt have survived back when there were real men putting food on the table, not ordering from dominos, or picking up a steak wrapped in cellophane. I can see that you post these things to see what kind of reaction you get, so Im done here, you libtard.
"Flip and I."I think you failed to realize the dynamic element to interactions between me and flip.
Beyond that you have failed to realize that flip, in essence, was merely reinforcing the point i was making. If you look a it analytically, flip was just adding more dependent variables to the independent variable i eluded to.
try again.
funny, i much rather have my 64 bit version of xp....vista is a wanna be mac OS Xi understand new stuff is scary, but i promise all your meatloaf recipes will be safe if you upgrade to vista.