why that was nice

[bimma85 5,000+ posts]

Pretty sad

x2

 

[iagrdshaka 5,000+ posts]

ive only seen the old shows when i was a kid..think im going to skip the new movie..

The only thing the movie had going for it was boobies and Jessica's ***.

 

[badm0f0 10+ year member]

hahaha that rules.

 

[Prowler573 5,000+ posts]

Only in the south....//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/up2something.gif.dd110ecf3ae4b76050d87598f2f8de7c.gif

IA-dude....I was thinking as I read faulkton's post that it sounded like something that would happen in Louisiana and wondering how it was happening in the Dakotas.....'til I got to the link to the story and it was in Arkansas.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Made perfect sense after that //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crap.gif.7f4dd41e3e9b23fbd170a1ee6f65cecc.gif

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

People get high thousands of different ways. They **** spray paint out of paper bags, jog for miles, inhale whipped cream or hang themselves by their nipples from meat hooks. The problem with these, respectively, is that spray paint kills huge chunks of brain, “runner’s high” is a myth someone invented to sell more shoes, whipped cream only gets you high for six seconds and body mutilation doesn’t work unless you’re already a psychological mess. Generally, if something can actually get you high, you’re not allowed to take it.

There might be an herbal solution to this problem, though. Herbal intoxicants are perfectly legal, and are supposedly comparable to the regular drugs Nancy Reagan and fried eggs warned us about. But we’re not about to take some hippie herbal drug manufacturer’s word for it. We wanted to find out if these things really worked. To do so, The Wave Magazine scientifically put me through a battery of tests with four different drugs: Salvia Divinorum, Mood Modulator, Reality Relaxer and Clonibus (all available at http://www.digital-drugstore.com).

results

http://www.thewavemag.com/pagegen.php?pagename=article&articleid=22431

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

Machiavellianism is the term some social and personality psychologists use to describe a person's tendency to deceive and manipulate others for personal gain. The concept is named after Renaissance diplomat and writer Niccolò Machiavelli, who wrote Il Principe (The Prince). In 1970 Richard Christie developed a test for measuring a person's level of Machiavellianism. This eventually became the MACH-IV test, a twenty-statement personality survey that is now the standard self-assessment tool of Machiavellianism.

http://www.salon.com/books/it/1999/09/13/machtest/

I just finished reading the prince..awesome book. Take the test and see where you fall. Im betting most rep/post wh0res are high machs.. I got an 84 //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crap.gif.7f4dd41e3e9b23fbd170a1ee6f65cecc.gif

 

[swc204 10+ year member]

62

 

[LoudCrownVic 5,000+ posts]

The Machiavelli personality test has a range of 0-100

Your Machiavelli score is: 75

You are a high Mach, you endorse Machiavelli's opinions.

Eh...

This test would have completely varied on my mood.

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

High Machs tend to take a more detached, calculating approach in their interaction with other people. They tend to believe most people are concerned only with their own well-being and to depend too much on anyone else is foolish. They believe the best way to get by is to use deception, rewards, promises, flattery, and even punishments to manipulate others into doing their bidding. To them, power may be more important than love.

In terms of big five personality traits, Machiavellians tend to be low on agreeableness and conscientiousness.

Some scholars and researchers have attempted to find a correlation between Machiavellianism and narcissistic personality disorder and psychopathy.

Robert Altemeyer found a correlation between Social dominance orientation and Machiavellianism.

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

Low Machs tend to take a more personal, empathetic approach in their interaction with other people. They tend to be more trusting of others and more honest. They believe humans are essentially good natured. At the extreme, low Machs are passive, submissive, and highly agreeable.

 

[HydroCloud 10+ year member]

I got a 70. Alittle surprising, I guess I'm feeling mean right now.

 

[tRiGgEr 5,000+ posts]

Your Machiavelli score is: 70

You are a high Mach, you endorse Machiavelli's opinions.

I don't get it.

 

[LoudCrownVic 5,000+ posts]

So I'm a psychopath. I can live with that.

 

[tRiGgEr 5,000+ posts]

I understand how not to be personal when interacting with people. And when it is needed. Knowing when to be personal or not.

 

[KnOkIn It 420 10+ year member]

The Machiavelli personality test has a range of 0-100

Your Machiavelli score is: 53

You are a low Mach, you reject Machiavelli's opinions.

Most people fall somewhere in the middle, but there's a significant minority at either extreme.

????