You hate this forum, and US citizens so much.If this forum is any indication of our generation as a whole...
A.
Lot.
the cop, the woman close behind.I don't know who is the bigger failure here. The cop or the woman?
It is sick, regardless if she was pregnant or not. He already had her flat on her stmach, he didnt have to do all that. Whether he should have tried to stop her or not, thats questionable. I always thought that if you wanted to abandon your young child or newborn all you had to do was drop them off at the police station or fire department, no questions asked. Maybe this is what the woman was trying to do? Need more details. But she still should not have been tazerized, pregnant or not.Well could have been excessive. But i LOVE how the media goes cop tasers preg woman. (first thing goes through your head is wow that is just sick) then you find out the preg woman never identified herself as prego. I honestly HATE the media
you have hate in your heart, thats why.He is definitely the type of officers that gives the rest a bad name. However, I would taser the woman for being a burden to society, and for fun. It's really win/win.
I believe this is only if they are 6 month old or younger. It might be less than that.It is sick, regardless if she was pregnant or not. He already had her flat on her stmach, he didnt have to do all that. Whether he should have tried to stop her or not, thats questionable. I always thought that if you wanted to abandon your young child or newborn all you had to do was drop them off at the police station or fire department, no questions asked. Maybe this is what the woman was trying to do? Need more details. But she still should not have been tazerized, pregnant or not.
See im wrong. And think about it, that lady might have heard the same thing, but didnt know the cut off, like I did. So once they started asking her questions, in he rmind she might have been like (they arent supposed to be asking me anything, im out of here). //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/imdaman.gif.bc6c552e19aa4ad8c47461144f40eb1a.gif Need more details.I believe this is only if they are 6 month old or younger. It might be less than that.
Unfortunately ignorance doesn't put you above the law. Perhaps if one hears this, they should call around and verify all facts to this article they heard, before just popping up at their door.See im wrong. And think about it, that lady might have heard the same thing, but didnt know the cut off, like I did. So once they started asking her questions, in he rmind she might have been like (they arent supposed to be asking me anything, im out of here). //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/imdaman.gif.bc6c552e19aa4ad8c47461144f40eb1a.gif Need more details.
true, but how does this misinformation make her in violation of any law? By not knowing the age cut off, there was no law being broken.Unfortunately ignorance doesn't put you above the law. Perhaps if one hears this, they should call around and verify all facts to this article they heard, before just popping up at their door.
I still maintain both the officer and the woman are a burden to us all.