why that was nice

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

i havent seen you come up with anything better:crap:

das y i post da qwession

 

[anj46907 10+ year member]

das y i post da qwession

give me credit for making a effort....im just a truck driver sheesh:crap:

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

u'll believe in evolution but i think charles b rong.

 

[jpexpc 10+ year member]

Adam's Curse is a 2003 book by Oxford University human genetics professor Bryan Sykes expounding his hypothesis that with the declining sperm count in men and the continual atrophy of the Y chromosome, within 5,000 generations (approximately 125,000 years) the male of the human species will become extinct.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam%27s_Curse

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

ninja got talent

 

[zthumper 10+ year member]

pro choice *****

 

[newusername 10+ year member]

To be clear, the fact of evolution and the modern evolutionary synthesis theory do not live or die on our limited understanding of a singular behaviour.

With that said, there are a few possible benefits to infanticide. First, it is often seen as a reaction to population or resource issues. Second, parents could selectively kill lower-quality offspring. Third, parents could enhance their reproductive rate through mate attractiveness (by achieving a degree of dominance).

 

[GTO Dave 10+ year member]

So let me guess....dinosaurs didn't exist...or if they did they co-existed with man 400 years ago.....take a science class in paleontology and then gimme your opinion....

Dave

 

[Blue Fury 10+ year member]

How about because infanticide is an act.. not CHANGE OVER TIME. So what your asking is, how can CHANGE OVER TIME explain infanticide. It does just as well as why we like car audio.

How did you come to this as to deal with evolution?

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

To be clear, the fact of evolution and the modern evolutionary synthesis theory do not live or die on our limited understanding of a singular behaviour.
With that said, there are a few possible benefits to infanticide. First, it is often seen as a reaction to population or resource issues. Second, parents could selectively kill lower-quality offspring. Third, parents could enhance their reproductive rate through mate attractiveness (by achieving a degree of dominance).

u fail

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

So let me guess....dinosaurs didn't exist...or if they did they co-existed with man 400 years ago.....take a science class in paleontology and then gimme your opinion....
Dave

u mad

 

[tEh koRnDog 5,000+ posts]

who mad?

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

How about because infanticide is an act.. not CHANGE OVER TIME. So what your asking is, how can CHANGE OVER TIME explain infanticide. It does just as well as why we like car audio.
How did you come to this as to deal with evolution?

im talk about survival of the fittest and ****** selection.

How is something like killing your babys help u species live?

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]

who mad?

he mad. he no it.

 

[faulkton 5,000+ posts]