To all current enclosure designers: a proposal

[Enellz 10+ year member]

Glad you actually did this. It does seem like everyone designs boxes on here, and this is now going to be my reference to use next time I need one designed. Congrats to the winners

 

[mobeious 10+ year member]

thanx

 

[PV Audio 5,000+ posts]

Yo mobes, you want that sig ref?

 

[mobeious 10+ year member]

sure it dont matter

 

[dappa5 10+ year member]

meh

 

[mobeious 10+ year member]

meh

y didnt u enter

 

[ciaonzo 5,000+ posts]

Nice job putting this together, PV. Congrats to ALL the designers!

 

[iamamp3pimp 5,000+ posts]

Congrats to Mobes.

robinbutler702 at gmail

 

[Lakota 5,000+ posts]

Eh, would be a waste of time for me. I could care less if it's tuned 100% to spec, I care more about what the box actually does in a vehicle.

 

[marcotheclepto 10+ year member]

Eh, would be a waste of time for me. I could care less if it's tuned 100% to spec, I care more about what the box actually does in a vehicle.

true, but after knowing whats needed to work in the vehicle being able t oaccurately desing it from there is important. no?

 

[Pioneer~Saturn 5,000+ posts]

Since people were asking to see them, here's mine:

 

[DBfan187 5,000+ posts]

still doesn't compare to flakko's awesomeness!

 

[80INCHES 5,000+ posts]

i dq'd myself by accident..although it was VERY simple slot port i guess a 1/4inch taper was not allowed

oh well next time

80

 

[loud-n-low 10+ year member]

i dq'd myself by accident..although it was VERY simple slot port i guess a 1/4inch taper was not allowedoh well next time

80

80, i pm'ed you asking if you could poss build me a box since we are both in NY. let me know

 

[80INCHES 5,000+ posts]

Objective results:
1. mobeious: 1.998cf @ 30.0102Hz .13% ERROR

2. marcotheclepto: 2.047cf@ 30.29Hz 3.317% ERROR

3. spltuscon: 2.02cf @ 30.8Hz 3.67% ERROR

4. Pioneer Saturn: 2.02cf @ 30.89Hz 3.967% ERROR

5. imamp3pimp: 2.024cf @ 31.27Hz 5.4% ERROR

These are the weighted objective scores, not the absolute objective scores in case you decide to go in and check and see if my math is correct. Aside from mobes, this is curiously the exact opposite order of the subjective scoring (IIRC, marco and tuscon scored either the same or within .5 on that portion). As is no surprise, as things get more complicated, errors tend to go up. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

mines was 2.01cf @30.65hz...not sure wat the error on that is

80