exactly, deadeye your calling my point pathetic because your saying our country blows based on some peoples beliefs... anyway you look at it your generalized statement is whats pathetic.This country was built on the primary factor of being able to have your own opinion and belief so the entire point of this thread is pathetic.
Did you see that? That was the single shit that I didn't give. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gifexactly, deadeye your calling my point pathetic because your saying our country blows based on some peoples beliefs... anyway you look at it your generalized statement is whats pathetic.
Burden of proof is on the claims maker. It's not anyone's job to disprove something in order to call it false, when there's no reason to refer to it as a truth in the first place.Can you prove it didn't?
Not saying I believe that 10,000 year line, but if you could prove positive that it did NOT happen that way it would put the whole thing to rest.
Separation of church and state makes this a pretty easy solution.Yes you are right about schools being able to teach any and all science, but in the same note should also be able to teach religion at the same time and not just christianity.
OK, in which case OP should "prove" whatever brand of creation of universe, and man he believes is correct.Burden of proof is on the claims maker. It's not anyone's job to disprove something in order to call it false, when there's no reason to refer to it as a truth in the first place.
That's not how this works. I don't know why you're getting to buttmad about this. I don't have to prove anything, and I never tried to say anything was fact.OK, in which case OP should "prove" whatever brand of creation of universe, and man he believes is correct.
I'm just playing devil's advocate here. If 43% people are stupid, as you say, you should be able to either prove them wrong or prove your version is right.That's not how this works. I don't know why you're getting to buttmad about this. I don't have to prove anything, and I never tried to say anything was fact.
I've been trying very hard not to argue with you about your deluded views on much of car audio, and the idea of "proving" things "with quotations" around every "other word", but it's becoming almost unbearable.
You, sir, have very flawed ideas.
I am able to prove them wrong, but I don't really feel like explaining to you what proof there is. It's not my fault that you're uneducated; it's not my duty to educate you. If you're interested, start by Googling fossilization. Then radioactive decay and dating techniques, maybe a bit of physics? I don't know where you're confused.I'm just playing devil's advocate here. If 43% people are stupid, as you say, you should be able to either prove them wrong or prove your version is right.
I'll be happy to entertain your ideas about what I've said in this thread or elsewhere. And how many things did I use qoutes around?