THE OFFICAL 911 was a inside job thread

Was 911 an inside job?

  • Yes.

    Votes: 94 47.7%
  • No.

    Votes: 86 43.7%
  • Not sure yet but I will visit <a href="http://www.UniversalSeed.org" rel="external nofollow">http://

    Votes: 17 8.6%

  • Total voters
    197
Status
Not open for further replies.
Fancy, anybody in an educated field could have an opinion that contradicts what he has found through research. Hence, an opinion versus fact. And even if the person giving the opinion/their version on the collapse is a nuclear physicist, you have to learn basic physics before you can specialize. Just like a doctor has to know about general medicine before specializing in the field of their choice.

 
Wait, fancy, isn't this also a "little internet talk group"? Seems to me that nobody is taking you seriously. I never gave thought to a cover-up, but they do have more cites than you do. There's plenty of facts at forums, try the Snopes forum for instance.

 
"However, it should be noted that one of the curious characteristics of conspiracy theorists is that they effortlessly change their so called evidence in response to each aspect which is debunked. As soon as one delusion is unmasked, they simply invent another to replace it, and deny that the first ever existed. Eventually, when they have turned full circle through this endlessly changing fantasy fog , they then re-invent the original delusion and deny that you ever debunked it, thus beginning the circle once more. This technique is known as "the fruit loop" and saves the conspiracy theorist from ever having to see any of their ideas through to their (ill)logical conclusions."

 
Fancy, anybody in an educated field could have an opinion that contradicts what he has found through research. Hence, an opinion versus fact. And even if the person giving the opinion/their version on the collapse is a nuclear physicist, you have to learn basic physics before you can specialize. Just like a doctor has to know about general medicine before specializing in the field of their choice.
Physics can hardly be applied to engineering, fire saftey, aviation, demolition, and intell. My dad is a nuclear physicist at michigan, so I dont think Im wrong on this. Ive already proved substiantially that byu prof. jones has been contrdicted by his colleagues and numorous other structural engineers. Why do you take his research seriously, and not the other experts? He hasnt published his paper, you know why? becuase its BS and he knows if he published it, it would torn apart by well respected engineering journals.

The fact is, no one is has the time or the effort to analyze this guy's paper line by line, He has a hard time proving that 9/11 was faked, he'll have an even more difficult time proving it was demolition.

 
Wait, fancy, isn't this also a "little internet talk group"? Seems to me that nobody is taking you seriously. I never gave thought to a cover-up, but they do have more cites than you do. There's plenty of facts at forums, try the Snopes forum for instance.
yes this is a talk group, whats your point? I was saying that these theorists stay in internet cubby holes, sheltered from public challenge.

Your logic is bunk, so basically since they cite more links than I do, that makes them correct? In case you havent forgotten, every repected media outlet in the world reported in favor of the original story. I could post a thousands links supporting me, what would that prove?

Listen, Ive asked some simple logical questions that these theorists cant even touch. What does that say to you?

 
Id love to hear you guys get in a logical debate in real life, where you dont have access to thousands of conspiracy sites through google, you'd be absolutely destroyed with basic reasoning.I guess thats why you guys hide away in your little internet talk groups like "loose change", attempting to remain unchallenged, when really its that no one bother to take you seriously.
Id love to get in a debate w/ you in real life since all your facts coome the same way ours do...from the internet.

O and thanks for the re-wording there. SHows how mature you are. Im stil lwaiting for those questions mr.debunker:rolleyes: //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/blush.gif.99bc659ee2012b7d826165e26fb5eebe.gif

 
Are you really that stupid? Physics is the basis of most engineering. My god.
basis is quite different from the specific field of structural engineering. my god.

most sane physicists wouldnt even try arguing against engineers in their respected fields, but what do I know, my dad is only a physics prof. at an elite institution //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif .

I love how you pick apart my posts and take things out of context.

 
Id love to get in a debate w/ you in real life since all your facts coome the same way ours do...from the internet. O and thanks for the re-wording there. SHows how mature you are. Im stil lwaiting for those questions mr.debunker:rolleyes: //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/blush.gif.99bc659ee2012b7d826165e26fb5eebe.gif
No, your facts come from the internet, all of mine come from EXPERTS, what other way could I get them to you? Should I mail the MIT paper to you? They have been published and reviewed.

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif

I posed simple question, without help from 911 sites, which you cannot answer.

What questions? The ones that have no evidence? You cant even answer my simple logical question, where the **** are the passengers? WHERE ARE THEY

 
http://www-math.mit.edu/~bazant/WTC/WTC-asce.pdf

Ill post it again so you dont ignore it.

Your turn, how about picking that apart line by line?

edit: Since some of you are clearly unfamiliar with college, heres some info about MIT:

"MIT is ranked #2 overall among the world's top 200 universities by The Times Higher Education Supplement (2005) and #1 worldwide in technology.[14] Additionally, MIT is ranked #5 in the world by The Institute of Higher Education at Shanghai Jiao Tong University's.[15] top 500 universities in the world.

The National Research Council, in a 1995 study ranking research universities in the US, ranked MIT #1 in "reputation" and #4 for "citations or awards density" for all programs. [16]

MIT's graduate programs in chemistry, computer science, economics, engineering, mathematics, and physics placed first in U. S. News and World Reports' 2007 rankings. MIT has also been ranked as the #1 graduate school for engineering since U.S. News began ranking programs.[citation needed]

The Lombardi Program on Measuring University Performance has identified MIT as one of the Top 5 national reasearch universities since it began ranking in 2000. [17]"

 
Id love to hear you guys get in a logical debate in real life, where you dont have access to thousands of conspiracy sites through google, you'd be absolutely destroyed with basic reasoning.I guess thats why you guys hide away in your little internet talk groups like "loose change", attempting to remain unchallenged, when really its that no one bother to take you seriously.

I dare you to come to the loose change forums and debate this.

If you message roxdogg on that forum he will be more than happy to have you on his radio show to discuss 911;)

Check out this thread

http://www.caraudio.com/forum/showthread.php?t=157743&amp;highlight=911

Theres a lot of useful info in there.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...

About this thread

Crown_amps

Banned
Thread starter
Crown_amps
Joined
Location
British Columbia
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
2,298
Views
33,606
Last reply date
Last reply from
Imtjnotu
IMG_20260515_202650612_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 15, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260515_202732887_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 15, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top