The amazing racist is back - problem?

[ChevyRidinLow]

What? Did you bozos think i forgot?


i have already concluded some time ago that you don't care about much but your own self indulgent ego,.. so, why be rhetorical with me? wait, is it; ego needs stroking to remain consistent?

Unlike you, Ca.com is not the center of my universe, nor john's, nor juan's,.. so however many people they proved anything to is not a very significant amount to those of us who live in reality outside of a forum, and most likely, they consist mainly of the children you coddle and appease online.

It shows considerably how biased you are, especially now with the implimentation that you've decided whatever it is i have to say is not worth your attention based on yet another assumption that i will act in the same manor as my associates.

this is def the dept. In which your integrity is questionable,.. and foolish, to boot. fyi: this whole forum is your business, you agreed to that when you became a mod, what? 4 monts ago?. If it wasnt, you nor any other would be listed as an acting mod in the vendors section,.. so grow some balls and take responsibility. Furthermore, i see nothing stated anywhere that charges a vendor to moderate their section when prompted for payment. like you said, its just a perk, or better yet,.. a "priviledge" if you prefer,.. not a requirement. (another assumption on your part)

Anyone has every right to question authority,.. and lets face it,.. your authority is only confined to this site, so im not really surprised if you take it too seriously and get easily offended from the criticism being brought before you.

Truth hurts, sometimes,.. And the truth is, is that your charade of a "family friendly" premise couldnt be further from it. Maybe you're just in denial, but the fact remains that all the kids you babysit and act a fool here dont do you any justice when you allow them to treat others like complete shyt for all to see. We as a collective have the priviledge to raise a red flag in order to get results from those in power who show a lack of interest for the well being of supporting vendors in general,.. you, yourself made that perfectly clear by stating above that you dont even look in there.

Your catchin on, quick.... "He" didnt mod it for a reason, chief. Also,.. refer to above^.

like i said, we followed the protocol we were given to advert. splc. our interest was to afford people with privacy, as well as information that seems to get deleted from half the other car audio sites on the net and what you've been libelously been referring to people as false. God forbid you be noted for those accusations as biased and unfounded, and realistically, its not for you to say.

if you have nothing to hide, why has splc's vendor thread been deleted?, and juans post that got him banished? How are we to believe it was rightious? And how about all the shit about the less than savory actions of caco's new owner that you keep dismissing a fabricated?

Sounds like socialistic double standards, heir direcktor.

we arent askin you to be here, if you dont like the way stuff is run then gtfo. besides we dont like your kind 'round these parts so you best get steppin before we type some very hurtful things.

 

[brodeisel 10+ year member]

What? Did you bozos think i forgot?


i have already concluded some time ago that you don't care about much but your own self indulgent ego,.. so, why be rhetorical with me? wait, is it; ego needs stroking to remain consistent?

Unlike you, Ca.com is not the center of my universe, nor john's, nor juan's,.. so however many people they proved anything to is not a very significant amount to those of us who live in reality outside of a forum, and most likely, they consist mainly of the children you coddle and appease online.

It shows considerably how biased you are, especially now with the implimentation that you've decided whatever it is i have to say is not worth your attention based on yet another assumption that i will act in the same manor as my associates.

this is def the dept. In which your integrity is questionable,.. and foolish, to boot. fyi: this whole forum is your business, you agreed to that when you became a mod, what? 4 monts ago?. If it wasnt, you nor any other would be listed as an acting mod in the vendors section,.. so grow some balls and take responsibility. Furthermore, i see nothing stated anywhere that charges a vendor to moderate their section when prompted for payment. like you said, its just a perk, or better yet,.. a "priviledge" if you prefer,.. not a requirement. (another assumption on your part)

Anyone has every right to question authority,.. and lets face it,.. your authority is only confined to this site, so im not really surprised if you take it too seriously and get easily offended from the criticism being brought before you.

Truth hurts, sometimes,.. And the truth is, is that your charade of a "family friendly" premise couldnt be further from it. Maybe you're just in denial, but the fact remains that all the kids you babysit and act a fool here dont do you any justice when you allow them to treat others like complete shyt for all to see. We as a collective have the priviledge to raise a red flag in order to get results from those in power who show a lack of interest for the well being of supporting vendors in general,.. you, yourself made that perfectly clear by stating above that you dont even look in there.

Your catchin on, quick.... "He" didnt mod it for a reason, chief. Also,.. refer to above^.

like i said, we followed the protocol we were given to advert. splc. our interest was to afford people with privacy, as well as information that seems to get deleted from half the other car audio sites on the net and what you've been libelously been referring to people as false. God forbid you be noted for those accusations as biased and unfounded, and realistically, its not for you to say.

if you have nothing to hide, why has splc's vendor thread been deleted?, and juans post that got him banished? How are we to believe it was rightious? And how about all the shit about the less than savory actions of caco's new owner that you keep dismissing a fabricated?

Sounds like socialistic double standards, heir direcktor.

 

[05fronty 5,000+ posts]

What? Did you bozos think i forgot?


i have already concluded some time ago that you don't care about much but your own self indulgent ego,.. so, why be rhetorical with me? wait, is it; ego needs stroking to remain consistent?

Unlike you, Ca.com is not the center of my universe, nor john's, nor juan's,.. so however many people they proved anything to is not a very significant amount to those of us who live in reality outside of a forum, and most likely, they consist mainly of the children you coddle and appease online.

It shows considerably how biased you are, especially now with the implimentation that you've decided whatever it is i have to say is not worth your attention based on yet another assumption that i will act in the same manor as my associates.

this is def the dept. In which your integrity is questionable,.. and foolish, to boot. fyi: this whole forum is your business, you agreed to that when you became a mod, what? 4 monts ago?. If it wasnt, you nor any other would be listed as an acting mod in the vendors section,.. so grow some balls and take responsibility. Furthermore, i see nothing stated anywhere that charges a vendor to moderate their section when prompted for payment. like you said, its just a perk, or better yet,.. a "priviledge" if you prefer,.. not a requirement. (another assumption on your part)

Anyone has every right to question authority,.. and lets face it,.. your authority is only confined to this site, so im not really surprised if you take it too seriously and get easily offended from the criticism being brought before you.

Truth hurts, sometimes,.. And the truth is, is that your charade of a "family friendly" premise couldnt be further from it. Maybe you're just in denial, but the fact remains that all the kids you babysit and act a fool here dont do you any justice when you allow them to treat others like complete shyt for all to see. We as a collective have the priviledge to raise a red flag in order to get results from those in power who show a lack of interest for the well being of supporting vendors in general,.. you, yourself made that perfectly clear by stating above that you dont even look in there.

Your catchin on, quick.... "He" didnt mod it for a reason, chief. Also,.. refer to above^.

like i said, we followed the protocol we were given to advert. splc. our interest was to afford people with privacy, as well as information that seems to get deleted from half the other car audio sites on the net and what you've been libelously been referring to people as false. God forbid you be noted for those accusations as biased and unfounded, and realistically, its not for you to say.

if you have nothing to hide, why has splc's vendor thread been deleted?, and juans post that got him banished? How are we to believe it was rightious? And how about all the shit about the less than savory actions of caco's new owner that you keep dismissing a fabricated?

Sounds like socialistic double standards, heir direcktor.

who gives a flying horse fuck really!

 

[whitedragon551 5,000+ posts]

 

[05trailblazer 10+ year member]

well glad those crazy kids aint here no more

 

[brodeisel 10+ year member]

perfect now lets go ruin there forum. nvm lets not let them make money off of us lets make money off of them and let them keep getting trolled.

 

[audioholic 5,000+ posts]

What? Did you bozos think i forgot?


i have already concluded some time ago that you don't care about much but your own self indulgent ego,.. so, why be rhetorical with me? wait, is it; ego needs stroking to remain consistent?

Unlike you, Ca.com is not the center of my universe, nor john's, nor juan's,.. so however many people they proved anything to is not a very significant amount to those of us who live in reality outside of a forum, and most likely, they consist mainly of the children you coddle and appease online.

It shows considerably how biased you are, especially now with the implimentation that you've decided whatever it is i have to say is not worth your attention based on yet another assumption that i will act in the same manor as my associates.

this is def the dept. In which your integrity is questionable,.. and foolish, to boot. fyi: this whole forum is your business, you agreed to that when you became a mod, what? 4 monts ago?. If it wasnt, you nor any other would be listed as an acting mod in the vendors section,.. so grow some balls and take responsibility. Furthermore, i see nothing stated anywhere that charges a vendor to moderate their section when prompted for payment. like you said, its just a perk, or better yet,.. a "priviledge" if you prefer,.. not a requirement. (another assumption on your part)

Anyone has every right to question authority,.. and lets face it,.. your authority is only confined to this site, so im not really surprised if you take it too seriously and get easily offended from the criticism being brought before you.

Truth hurts, sometimes,.. And the truth is, is that your charade of a "family friendly" premise couldnt be further from it. Maybe you're just in denial, but the fact remains that all the kids you babysit and act a fool here dont do you any justice when you allow them to treat others like complete shyt for all to see. We as a collective have the priviledge to raise a red flag in order to get results from those in power who show a lack of interest for the well being of supporting vendors in general,.. you, yourself made that perfectly clear by stating above that you dont even look in there.

Your catchin on, quick.... "He" didnt mod it for a reason, chief. Also,.. refer to above^.

like i said, we followed the protocol we were given to advert. splc. our interest was to afford people with privacy, as well as information that seems to get deleted from half the other car audio sites on the net and what you've been libelously been referring to people as false. God forbid you be noted for those accusations as biased and unfounded, and realistically, its not for you to say.

if you have nothing to hide, why has splc's vendor thread been deleted?, and juans post that got him banished? How are we to believe it was rightious? And how about all the shit about the less than savory actions of caco's new owner that you keep dismissing a fabricated?

Sounds like socialistic double standards, heir direcktor.

I did not assume you would act in the same manner as your associates, my comments toward you, about you, are based on how you have acted, yourself. If you had acted in the same manner as your 'associates' you would also now be banned. Both of them were given multiple warnings, multiple chances, both took those opportunities to make things worse.

If we were interested in hiding anything, we would delete your comments, wouldn't we? On that note, I was not the one who deleted juan's reply, another mod did. I imagine out of simple courtesy, since it was nothing more than an ugly personal attack towards me. But since you want to pretend we have anything to hide, I have undeleted the post. Its on page 2, see for yourself.

I dont know why SPLC's vendor thread has been deleted, you'd have to ask the mod who deleted it.

What does the actions of CACO's new owner have to do with this, and when did I dismiss them as fabricated?

"Truth hurts, sometimes,.. And the truth is, is that your charade of a "family friendly" premise couldnt be further from it. Maybe you're just in denial, but the fact remains that all the kids you babysit and act a fool here dont do you any justice when you allow them to treat others like complete shyt for all to see. We as a collective have the priviledge to raise a red flag in order to get results from those in power who show a lack of interest for the well being of supporting vendors in general,.. you, yourself made that perfectly clear by stating above that you dont even look in there."

As for me not moderating SPL.com's subforum, its the reason I already stated previously, that its my interpretation that vendors possessing a subforum here are given moderator powers within their subforum so that they can moderate what THEY want. If juan had contacted me to ask for help moderating, I would have been glad to. Otherwise, I felt I was stepping into the vendors' business/territory. Juan never contacted me, and frankly, I didnt even know us 'not moderating' his subforum was even a concern of his until recently. I find it ironic that he had mod powers, specifically for his subforum, didnt moderate that subforum, and then blames the general mods for not stepping in. When he didnt even ask us for help. Sounds like hindsight excuses to me. The reason juan didnt moderate his own subforum is... inexplicable. And its amazing that no other vendors have trouble with moderating their own subforums.

And again, if he'd have simply contacted me to let me (or another mod) know there was a problem, I/we would have had no issue helping. If your 'associates' had a problem with how the moderation of their subforum, or lack there of, was transpiring, they should have addressed the problem in a mature, reasonable, and professional manner. I only found out there was ANY problem when I started reading sigs bad mouthing this site, its mods, and even its members. Both juan and coma were abusive, and frankly, childish, when contacted to pursue the issue. Ever your latest reply is 80% personal insults. You all sound like pissed off teenagers. That's fine, but display that attitude and personality on some site other than ca.com.

Have a nice day.

 

[thevic24 5,000+ posts]

Lots of AE's ITT......

Some one and the same......

 

[Suicide Bobb 5,000+ posts]

Yep...still nobody here supports anyone from SPLC.

 

[05fronty 5,000+ posts]

Filipinos Hunt Even Bigger Beast After 1-Ton Croc Catch | FoxNews.com