f
uck this is a s
hit ton of quotes
Oh, get over yourself you gun totting Neanderthal. Suddenly it's a GRAVE INJUSTICE because you can't own a highly deadly weapon? For everyone one good reason you can give for why you should be able to purchase and own an assault rifle, I can give you about five reasons why you shouldn't.BOO-HOO SECOND AMENDMENT! It doesn't say which fire arms you can have. Just that you can have them. I assure you, though, your day to day life shouldn't be effected by this bill.
if Hussein decided to take away you right to free speech would you be mad? by your reasoning you shouldnt be mad
The difference between guns and everything else you own is that the 1 and only reason guns were made was to kill things, whereas nothing else you own is, also why you comparing them to subs is invalid, a gun is designed to kill, that is its one and only purpose, I know of no one who has been killed with a sub.
guns do alot more than kill people
Sorry, but that is not why they are or were made. I am sure the inventors thought "Gee, lets go target and skeet shooting with this." No, they thought, "Let's go kill some motherfuckers with this."
yes i am sure they wanted to kill them some mother f
uckers //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif
6 pages and still no good reason as to why they shouldnt be banned other than 'the constitution' or I just should.
Guess that pretty much sums up why its going to pass now doesnt it. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif
so the constitution doesnt matter? ok then i guess if Hussein took away your right to free speech you shouldnt be mad? the only reason you have free speech is because of the constitution but it doesnt matter now apparently //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif
You make a decent point, however because hunters don't NEED anything remotely close to an automatic weapon, we don't NEED them... Therefore I am fine with banning them.
I don't NEED dynomite to kill fish, so does that mean I should be able to own it anyway?
a legally bought ar-15 is not automatic
I think bans are wrong, but I also think owning guns to protect yourself from the government is wrong or maybe just stupid. If the gov comes knocking on your door asking for you to surrender your weapon you **** sure better. One guy can have all the guns in the world and as soon as the military shows up at your doorstep you just became target practice.
So you don't really need a gun to protect yourself from the government...
if the gov or anyone for that matter comes knocking at my door and wants my guns i am going to tell them to f
uck off and slam the door in their face
if they try and take my AR ill be pissed
they wont...if the ever did tho i hope you will protect your right to have it
actually the rate of firing on both is as fast as you can pull the trigger. So its the same Rate of Fire.
correct
wrong dumb a
ss
would be mine too...i will defend my right to own guns if it comes to that
I'm not planning to read the full 330+ posts above to see if it's been said already but when you gun nuts quote the second amendment saying "it gives you the right to bear arms", have you seen what the amendment actually says?
Do any of you gun owners belong to a well regulated militia?
NRA bi
tch
yup... the NRA //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif
high five //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif
==========================================================
ok now that i have answered most of the dumb s
hits in this thread im going to say something myself
the right to own guns is in the constitution...the moment the constitution is not followed anymore is when the gov will start turning into china...the only thing protecting your rights is the constitution
I myself own an AR-15 as part of my 40+ collection of guns. I go to the range regularly and have fun while i am there. I know most people are going to say that having that many guns is pointless but why have 10 subs when you can get bass from 1? hell you can get bass from stock speakers so why have anything aftermarket anyways? //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/confused.gif.e820e0216602db4765798ac39d28caa9.gif
Do i need to own guns? no...do you need to own cars or an audio system? nope...same principal
just because people dont use speakers as weapons doesnt mean they cant be used in that manner. i could easily throw one or drop one on your head and kill you. so by your logic since it can kill people it should be banned.
My guns have never killed anyone and they never will unless i am defending myself or my family. but if i ever needed to use them for protection i would not hesitate to use deadly force on anyone trying to harm me or my family. In Tn you have the right to use deadly force if you feel that your life is threatened and many have done so.
People on here are talking about using AR-15's for mass murder. Please tell me one time someone has ran into a mall or anywhere and starting shooting people with an "assault" weapon and they killed more than a few people...a few people is not mass murder and could easily be done with a pistol. If i were going to be in a gun fight where the enemy was closer than about 50 yards i would take a pistol over a rifle any day because it is easier to conceal and maneuver.
A few people have been talking about the gov or police trying to take guns away from law abiding citizens. If that day ever came i would hope that every gun owning person laugh at them and defend their right to own guns to the death if it came to that...i sure would
ps. sorry for the long post but this is a very sensitive subject with me and i wanted to hit most of the points discussed in this thread.