how so. Diesel Jetta are turbo charged. GM uses turbocharges for forced induction. they learned their lesson that superchargers are only good for V8s and stopped using superchargers on their 4 cylinder cars like the cobalt, sky, soltice, g5, etc...wrong
Then it wasnt a Turbo or supercharged Cobalt. They made SS that werent. The early Cobalts had Eaton m45 supercharger, the newer ones are turbo, and they are quick. Most can keep up with me or close and my GTP runs 13 flat.Sucks balls my boys civic si smoked it and its tiny little turbo.
Wrong. GM used Superchargers on 3800 v6's for almost ten years up until like 07, and superchargers on 4 bangers as well. Motors have changed, v6's and v8's can be made lighter, smaller, cheaper, more powerful and more cost effectively. So there isnt much use for forced induction from the newer models like the G8.how so. Diesel Jetta are turbo charged. GM uses turbocharges for forced induction. they learned their lesson that superchargers are only good for V8s and stopped using superchargers on their 4 cylinder cars like the cobalt, sky, soltice, g5, etc...
maybe you missed the part of me saying that GM use to run superchargers and now use turbochargers. all motors including 4 cylinders can be made faster and more cost efficient. as for the "there isn't much use for forced induction from the newer models like the G8", I have to say there is no such thing as too much power. and for the 4 cylinders just blow, my focus is faster than your 13sec GM and I don't have boost.Wrong. GM used Superchargers on 3800 v6's for almost ten years up until like 07, and superchargers on 4 bangers as well. Motors have changed, v6's and v8's can be made lighter, smaller, cheaper, more powerful and more cost effectively. So there isnt much use for forced induction from the newer models like the G8.
4 cylinders just blow alltogether
Why wouldn't it...?all the vehicles you named use turbochargers not superchargers. and no way a TDI Jetta is doing 160 mph with significant mods.
stock gear ratio's wouldn't allow it and the amount of power needed to overcome the drag after 130 just isn't there. you'd need around 250hp to over come the drag reached at 140 plus the gear ratio.Why wouldn't it...?
My stock V6 Mustang did 120 like a pro, and still had more... and it's an over-weight cow that only has 140bhp. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif
Well show me that timeslip. No n/a focus is close to 13 seconds. Chances are you dont have a clue how fast it is, but no matter its still a Ford Focusmaybe you missed the part of me saying that GM use to run superchargers and now use turbochargers. all motors including 4 cylinders can be made faster and more cost efficient. as for the "there isn't much use for forced induction from the newer models like the G8", I have to say there is no such thing as too much power. and for the 4 cylinders just blow, my focus is faster than your 13sec GM and I don't have boost.
idk.. i have 155hp on my 2001 altima and i got it to 135 and it had a little left.. thats with whats in my trunk and all.. ghandy bridge a 3am with no one else equals free dyno lolstock gear ratio's wouldn't allow it and the amount of power needed to overcome the drag after 130 just isn't there. you'd need around 250hp to over come the drag reached at 140 plus the gear ratio.
he might have an svtWell show me that timeslip. No n/a focus is close to 13 seconds. Chances are you dont have a clue how fast it is, but no matter its still a Ford Focus
read my sig, i don't boost I spray.Well show me that timeslip. No n/a focus is close to 13 seconds. Chances are you dont have a clue how fast it is, but no matter its still a Ford Focus
do you really think b/c your speedometer has 160 that your car can really reach that? go peg that speedo than let me know.idk.. i have 155hp on my 2001 altima and i got it to 135 and it had a little left.. thats with whats in my trunk and all.. ghandy bridge a 3am with no one else equals free dyno lol