Somebody design me a ported enclosure for $$

[angrytrucker78 10+ year member]

poop

Click to read more...

 

[j3bus2k3 5,000+ posts]

Not to rain on your parade, but with those dimensions, you can only get 3.971ft^3 gross...sorry man.

 

[Beat_Dominator 5,000+ posts]

$50.

 

[angrytrucker78 10+ year member]

oops, I meant 46 inches wide..... That changes it a bit. Also after thinking about it, it could be a tad deeper as well. I should proof read before posting.

 

[j3bus2k3 5,000+ posts]

Those dimensions put you at 4.590...if you can go an inch deeper on depth, you'd be at 4.989 and could most likely be dead on with 4ft^3 net...

 

[xluben 10+ year member]

http://www.subwoofertools.com/forum/ported-box.asp?Ew=46&Eh=17&Dia=6&Xmax=16&Vd=.12&NumW=2&Vb=4&Fb=32&Qts=&Vas=&Fs=&CE=0

port and subs firing up. bigger dimensions and you can have a bigger port!

 

[angrytrucker78 10+ year member]

I know that's what I came up with as well. But if you put in the actual xmax of 26mm, the port gets giant. Is 3" enought port width to not have noise from it?

 

[ultimate157 5,000+ posts]

I know that's what I came up with as well. But if you put in the actual xmax of 26mm, the port gets giant. Is 3" enought port width to not have noise from it?

pm Iamamp3pimp

 

[angrytrucker78 10+ year member]

Nevermind. Thanks for the input anyway guys. I'm either gonna run one 12" Mag, or sell it and run two 10Q's when they come out. I'm tired of stressing out about space and stupid subwoofers.