some new pics of my mustang

[Tirefryr 10+ year member]

I don't like the 92-97's at all //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/frown.gif.a3531fa0534503350665a1e957861287.gif. I think the 99-04 was a huge improvement over em

You mean 94-98.

 

[saywhat? 5,000+ posts]

no matter how efficient my motor is/how much displacement i have i feel mine is the best looking as of late models. early models will always rule styling no matter the car IMO, but this is the next best you can get.

 

[marleyskater420 5,000+ posts]

no matter how efficient my motor is/how much displacement i have i feel mine is the best looking as of late models. early models will always rule styling no matter the car IMO, but this is the next best you can get.

Thats always good to feel that way about what you own.

Personally, the LS7 is one of the best looking engines I've seen. The IM shield just makes it all look so clean.

 

[HeatSeeker 10+ year member]

You mean 94-98.

//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/furious.gif.fc81ca146dbff91fede3ed290dbc4f4c.gif

 

[Prowler573 5,000+ posts]

yah, i believe all mustangs are nice looking cars (even mid 70's lol) id have to say the like 92-97 or whatever, the round bodies after the 5.0's, were the worst body.

The Mustang IIs, IMO, were the worst bodies....

Even the 'Cobra'-optioned cars with the factory window louvers and all.

 

[saywhat? 5,000+ posts]

The Mustang IIs, IMO, were the worst bodies....
Even the 'Cobra'-optioned cars with the factory window louvers and all.

lmao those are the mid to late 70's if i remember correctly. i like them...//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/eyebrow.gif.fe2c18d8720fe8c7eaed347b21ea05a5.gif//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/crying.gif.ec0ebefe590df0251476573bc49e46d8.gif