So? Like I always say, "**** passengers" //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gifA friend of mine got one of the new Mustangs. It's pretty nice, like cobalt blue if I remember correctly. I've only been in it once, but still it was still awesome. Just no room at all for anyone in the back.
x2, women aroud here do like those stangsif thats the case ..he can pull chix easier becuz they like his carnice pics saywhat..........very clean
18's or 20's will look good on it
80
Ok i'm sorry about that.still downplaying my car when i asked for none of these comments.
a maxima/saturn/nissan is a sedan/coupe car. A mustang is a sports car. Thus, when a man (those with a penis) choses a sports car, we would assume he would choose a V8, because, as we all have learned, V8's (or turbo 6's) make your penis even larger, and that is what girls are attracted to-large penis's. So OBVIOUSLY if you wanted to be cool, you would have opted for the V8.
Clearly he loves men, as I have just shown you, clearly.
i agree, 64's and 05/06's are the nicest lookin IMO.I like the new model more than the old ones. 64's and 06's are my fav. But I don't like red cars. A mustang is supposed to be a sports car, so I hope you're going that route. It could be a nice ride with some work.
I was being sarcastic. The mustang V6 is the new 5.0. 13's with bolt-ons.id rather drop the 8 grand into motor and suspension, rather than 75 horses and 1 inch of wheel and some thick sway bars........just my opinion. and i dont think a mustang is a sports car.....sports cars do more than a straight line stock......these dont and cant lmao. ive came out of too many corners sideways to consider this a good handling car.
I was a big fan of the '69, '70, and '71 Mach 1s. I thought the big-block cars with the induction hoods were pretty freggin' sharp-lookin', too.i agree, 64's and 05/06's are the nicest lookin IMO.l
Just quit while you are ahead. Its a good motor, just take it.IMO it surpasses the 5.0, or will in the near future when more parts come to the table like the 5.0's have.
I was a big fan of the '69, '70, and '71 Mach 1s. I thought the big-block cars with the induction hoods were pretty freggin' sharp-lookin', too.
Just my $0.02 //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif
you have less displacement...there is no way, given all things equal as you said, that you will be faster. Just stop now.nah, cuz i believe if the motor had all the options 5.0's have...it would hang/beat that motor. but thats my opinion.
nah, cuz i believe if the motor had all the options 5.0's have...it would hang/beat that motor. but thats my opinion.
I don't like the 92-97's at all //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/frown.gif.a3531fa0534503350665a1e957861287.gif. I think the 99-04 was a huge improvement over emyah, i believe all mustangs are nice looking cars (even mid 70's lol) id have to say the like 92-97 or whatever, the round bodies after the 5.0's, were the worst body.