Well if you can get past my bias, I absolutely love them. I've had a lot of them.hhow are the 10w6s im trying to find a decent 10
SubjectiveI think current technologies have made leaps and bounds over old amps //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/fyi.gif.9f1f679348da7204ce960cfc74bca8e0.gif
Thanks for the acknowledgement.Subjective
* Man, what a pissing match that turned out at the end to be civil
I have a point I would like to bring to the attention of Cody (cotjones).. I am curious why you didn't respond to Mike (cleansoundz) as he seemed to be trying to give you some break (and the only one) from all the negative feedback at the beginning.. IMO, if I were you in the situation you were in, I would have quoted his post & responded in some gratitude
http://www.caraudio.com/forum/showthread.php?p=6872299#post6872299
(not so much the first 2 sentence's though)
Subjective
* Man, what a pissing match that turned out at the end to be civil
I have a point I would like to bring to the attention of Cody (cotjones).. I am curious why you didn't respond to Mike (cleansoundz) as he seemed to be trying to give you some break (and the only one) from all the negative feedback at the beginning.. IMO, if I were you in the situation you were in, I would have quoted his post & responded in some gratitude
http://www.caraudio.com/forum/showthread.php?p=6872299#post6872299
(not so much the first 2 sentence's though)
Sorry, thought you were just making a statement. You have to understande that if i'd acknowledged the response to most of the members of this forum they'd have most likely taken offence. Because you were the one person with a reasonable attitude toward the mainstream brand I didn't want to say anything to get you to change your stance just to spite me, as would be typical of this forum. That said, I agree with ya!Thanks for the acknowledgement.
See, I don't see an amp that produces 139.2% of rated power without clipping as shitty. The amount of them that fail due to overheating is subjective, even experience as a dealer doesn't prove that.Well, if the 700x follows suit with my 300x it may not be that bad of an amplifier. I just measured mine with FOUR 4 ohm dummy loads (one per channel) to produce 52.2 watts RMS when it begins to clip. Not impressive by any means, but above the 37.5 it was rated to produce. Regardless, I am pleased for an essentially "free" amp.
The test was performed using an Iota DLS 55 amp power supply, a Velleman HPS 40 handheld oscilloscope, and an Alpine cda-9885 as loaded with a CD of test tones. I measured power using a 68 Hz test tone with the Velleman's RMS function.
Well, that, I can accept. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif I'd like to bench this one though. Maybe I will at work after I get caught up after this break. the 218 per channel is just what's on the birth sheet. It's supposed to be 175x4.the only reason they do over rated tho is because they under rate them lol but you have a good point as well. but you still wont ever see me recommend that line from rf ever
Yeah thats what i was thinking, thanks for the heads up. I do wonder how he has perfect feedback though, I guess if he resends the invoice through ebay i'll pay, worst case I'll get my money back eventually.dont do it its an old scam !!!!!if it isnt paid direct thru ebay u r fvcked dude i swear do not do not do not do it