By definition logic has to be based in reality and possibilities. If Libertarians every had any chance at all of winning, it would be this election. Had they picked Petersen i think they could have made a very good showing. Right now Gary can't get one single state.See that line of thinking just is terrible logic. Let's not vote for something because it will never win. By default you are containing something from happening that otherwise might happen if you supported it.
Not sure where you get a tree hugger from. He is anti government regulation (IRS EPA FDA). Yes he is a non interventionist but that is not an isolationist.
I still might vote for him (protest) because my state is pretty solid Red. My kids and inlaws... are voting for Gary, they normally vote Republican. But if my state becomes a swing state i'd have to vote for the one who can beat Hillary if nothing else but for the sake of the Supreme Court.
ps i'll lookup the his energy policies later. IIRC it was in a a debate he discussed his engery stance. but i want to double check that.
