I have active stability control, probably just as many airbags (although idc honestly),
Wrong and Wrong. Actually no type of electronic stability control was used by manufacturers in production until 95 and it was limited at that. your car was not an included model to receive it. And Mitsubishi has actually pretty much revolutionized the Electronic stability control field since then. Side and torso airbags also came after your car's time except in one or 2 cases.
and you're a total dumb shit if you think turbochargers give better low end. That is nowhere near the case, in fact it's nearly the direct opposite.
And no ***, thats not what I was saying, I was saying your's probably has a little better low end BECAUSE its turboed, in other words "your inline 5 would be smoked off the line without turbo." But i'm guessing yours is quite a bit lighter too. My comments proved near accurate i'm seeing 0-60 times for mine stock around 6.5 and yours is showing up in the 6.2's. Yet mine is running the quarter mile around .6 seconds better that yours. and topping out at around 145 compared to your 130, (of course both are limited.)
You're interior is nowhere near as comfortable as mine,
Subjective, I've preferred my interior to most other cars i've driven. It's very comfortable to me.
and you again would be absolutely wrong if you thought mine doesn't get any respect. I get plenty of people who know what they are talking about when it comes to cars talk about how understated and classy my car is. All you get is ricers who are like "Yo dood dats a sick whip mang you should get a huge exhaust and spoiler for that clean look mang". No self-respecting car enthusiast would ever appreciate a car with an ass larger than your mother's.
So you are really going to try to tell me RANDOM people you don't know have walked up just to comment on that old-*** looking car which isn't even that pretty on its cleanest days. It looks like every other generic mid-90's car. And mine is stock, no big exhaust and no spoiler. I think (along with alot of people) that it's a very pretty and flashy car, and it turns heads. It doesn't look like many other cars. It's far from generic looking.
And no, I did not pay twice as much, I paid 1/3 of what you paid for your car. I would have been out of my mind to spend any money on a brand new car. You walk them off the lot and they lose half their value. And if it was 10 years from now, your car would be about $5k, and mine would be $2k. So still, no comparison. Finally, yes, I can, and just did dog the value of your car. There's a good reason why so few of them are on the road. They were only DECENT at best upon release, and soon fell terribly far behind the competition. I don't see any reason why you would buy that over a similarly price Mustang GT, because it will perform considerably better, be cheaper to fix, and not look like a vagina.
You also got no good warranty or resale value, I can still trade mine in for a good penny and not have to shell much for repairs. And "similarly priced mustang GT's"? only just recently has the Mustang finally come up to par, and i'm talking about the latest big V6's those old V8's are garbage. and you will NEEEEEVER EVVVVERR catch me in any mustang.What does better than mine at the same year for less money? PLEASE answer me that. Show me some numbers that say there was a better value for the performance and options I got. (same year with similar warranties and such.)
So here we are again. You still think that people drive manuals for the Peen factor, and you still think your car is cool and a good value. You are still wrong on all fronts. People drive manuals because it makes driving FUN. I fall asleep driving automatics through mountain roads, it's boring as all hell. All you do is steer and accelerate. I can do the same things in any video game, and with less risk. How fast the shifts are done is absolutely 100% irrelevant, unless you are racing. All that gives is little ricers like you the opportunity to throw numbers out to increase your Peen.
Mine is a manual idioth! That doesn't mean I cant see that a faster shift = better performance. I hate pure auto's, but the GT-R transmission as audioholic has been making clear, is not an automatic.
Why don't you ask any one of our forum members...ANY of them. Ask them if they think your car was a good buy for $12k when you could have gotten more for $8k less. Ask them if they think that shift times matter for everyday driving. I will sit back and enjoy the laughter from those you ask. I still have yet to see any person on this forum support your car in the least, and you continue to deny it...
Why would anyone support my car when its easier to sit back and join the crowd, what benefit does that give anyone when many of them drive as equally old and valueless pieces as you do? It's a perfectly good value and nice car, just keep denying it and prising your 1994 turd (lol really i'm just kidding, I like the S4, but i'm proving a point.) It's to each his own but your grounds for dissing my car are very nonsensical.