The Maelstrom may have more distortion than the LMS, but it will play far lower flat
I have owned 2 lms ultra 5400's the old went a lil lower than the new but you'll need an eq to get them to play flat to Fs,
Flatter rsponse couldnt be further from the truth homie, motor strength wise, the lms is kind low for a motor of that diameter
For HT 11 cubes isnt really that large, people using the Re XXX 18 as HT need even more than that (over twice) to get it to shine. XBL is a joke... but huge driver, huge Xmax ftw at HT. The Soundsplinter RL-P is a better choice than the lms for HT Duty, Low Q woofers make for less than optimum performance in the HT environment.
after reading it all and scrolling down the the theatre room pics i was in love.
Really? A "joke"? If by a "joke" you mean lower natural coil inductance per the same desired stroke as other dual gap topologies, then I suppose you could say that. Or it can be perceived as a "joke" when you can lower mounting depth per the same desired stroke and reduce production driver cost due to the reduction of excess steel and magnets compared to other linear BL topologies out there. You can also mount shorting rings directly in the gap without reducing BL, etc. Man, what a crappy topology! //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif
I thought we were on caraudio.com ?...
