Menu
Forum
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Classifieds Member Feedback
SHOP
Shop Head Units
Shop Amplifiers
Shop Speakers
Shop Subwoofers
Shop eBay Car Audio
Log in / Register
Forum
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Log in / Join
What’s new
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
General Car Audio
Subwoofers
Speakers
Amplifiers
Head Units
Car Audio Build Logs
Wiring, Electrical and Installation
Enclosure Design & Construction
Car Audio Classifieds
Home Audio
Off-topic Discussion
The Lounge
What's new
Search forums
Menu
Reply to thread
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
maelstrom 18...!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Electrodynamic" data-source="post: 7241721" data-attributes="member: 548723"><p>Really? A "joke"? If by a "joke" you mean lower natural coil inductance per the same desired stroke as other dual gap topologies, then I suppose you could say that. Or it can be perceived as a "joke" when you can lower mounting depth per the same desired stroke and reduce production driver cost due to the reduction of excess steel and magnets compared to other linear BL topologies out there. You can also mount shorting rings directly in the gap without reducing BL, etc. Man, what a crappy topology! //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Electrodynamic, post: 7241721, member: 548723"] Really? A "joke"? If by a "joke" you mean lower natural coil inductance per the same desired stroke as other dual gap topologies, then I suppose you could say that. Or it can be perceived as a "joke" when you can lower mounting depth per the same desired stroke and reduce production driver cost due to the reduction of excess steel and magnets compared to other linear BL topologies out there. You can also mount shorting rings directly in the gap without reducing BL, etc. Man, what a crappy topology! [IMG]//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif[/IMG] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forum
Car Audio Discussion
Subwoofers
maelstrom 18...!
Top
Menu
What's new
Forum list