LosIsATool 5,000+ posts CarAudio.com Veteran 18,504 73 Pensacola, Florida Mar 14, 2017 #16 No I have 4.59 after MDF Click to expand... Without counting port, bracing, and drivers. That's gross. It will be around 3.5 net. That's a pair of 10s.
No I have 4.59 after MDF Click to expand... Without counting port, bracing, and drivers. That's gross. It will be around 3.5 net. That's a pair of 10s.
OP Based CarAudio.com Elite 898 0 Louisiana Mar 14, 2017 Thread Starter #17 Without counting port, bracing, and drivers. That's gross. It will be around 3.5 net. That's a pair of 10s. Click to expand... **** I didn't realize even if I use an aero port it'll displace a lot of space.
Without counting port, bracing, and drivers. That's gross. It will be around 3.5 net. That's a pair of 10s. Click to expand... **** I didn't realize even if I use an aero port it'll displace a lot of space.
kr15 5,000+ posts Polluting Residentials 6,702 56 California Mar 14, 2017 #18 If you need ssf you are tuned too high
LosIsATool 5,000+ posts CarAudio.com Veteran 18,504 73 Pensacola, Florida Mar 14, 2017 #19 You can still get dumb loud with a pair of monster 10s.
OP Based CarAudio.com Elite 898 0 Louisiana Mar 14, 2017 Thread Starter #20 You can still get dumb loud with a pair of monster 10s. Click to expand... Yeah but then I need more power which is $$$. I was hoping to just do 2 sa-12 or 1 sa-18 so I only need a little power. I might as well just do a single 15. Less power more cone area. And I need to figure out how I'm gonna do the port facing back because I only have like 12.5" of depth inside box
You can still get dumb loud with a pair of monster 10s. Click to expand... Yeah but then I need more power which is $$$. I was hoping to just do 2 sa-12 or 1 sa-18 so I only need a little power. I might as well just do a single 15. Less power more cone area. And I need to figure out how I'm gonna do the port facing back because I only have like 12.5" of depth inside box