tommyk90
5,000+ posts
THE WHOLE THING!!!
The air isn't going to have a chance to flow EFFICIENTLY through that 2nd chamber because the port opening is ABOVE that 2nd chamber.the speaker doesn't realize its even in an enclosure, the speaker mearly reacts to the new environment the best way it can, it reacts to the current being applied by the amplifier and it reacts in the enclosure its in, the sub will not even see the second chamber, the only reason i called it a second chamber was to help explain but its not a secondary chamber and the air wont flow in to the second chamber the subwoofer will pressurize the enclosure including the second chamber, and pressurized air will be forced out the port like it was planed. with out the light blue piece the port will just get shortened and not only increase the enclosure volume seen by the sub, but it will also increase the enclosure tuning.
The air pressure is going to find the easiest and quickest way out of the box, in this case the port, and not even pressurize that other chamber. It's going to throw tuning WAY off because of the much smaller airspace the sub is going to THINK it's in.
If you wanted to make it a little better, I would have made the port NOT go across the whole width of the box. Cut down on port area, somewhere around 35-40 square inches would be more than good enough. This would allow the port to be shorter and maintain the same tuning, and wouldn't have that disgusting labyrinth of a port.
This reminds me of chevyaudio's box that he made. He had a real skinny truck box with internal aeros. Even though the box was ~ 2 cubes, the internal aeros were in a large section of the box, thus not letting air pressurize the air AROUND the ports. Instead, the air flowed OUT of the ports, and his peak frequency was sky high because of this.


