The Camry
Hey, I Try.
Different car than you, different acoustics, different gear than you have, and i bet you didnt have the prs when you had them either.I've had your ESKs. Your SQ isn't all that.
Different car than you, different acoustics, different gear than you have, and i bet you didnt have the prs when you had them either.I've had your ESKs. Your SQ isn't all that.
You mean output at different frequencies in a open air environment.Thank you!!!When you get a real box that comes with spec sheet that tell you your tuning at different hz at different db's then we can talk... MR.Manufactors
True but they still ****. They are side by side with JL C2s with the ESK having a nut hair better 4k upDifferent car than you, different acoustics, different gear than you have, and i bet you didnt have the prs when you had them either.
When you decide to jump to the HSKs or higher you will think the same way.Different car than you, different acoustics, different gear than you have, and i bet you didnt have the prs when you had them either.
Did you have the old version or the new version? Besides. They arent bad speakers. I bet if you heard what ive done with them, you'd be impressed. Not all of us go all out 600$ on our speakers.(ok i am totally going too).True but they still ****. They are side by side with JL C2s with the ESK having a nut hair better 4k up
Did you have the old version or the new version? Besides. They arent bad speakers. I bet if you heard what ive done with them, you'd be impressed. Not all of us go all out 600$ on our speakers.(ok i am totally going too).
For the average consumer and Anyone who has heard my car. They sound pristine.
Old versions are extremely sub-par compared to the new versions. I was reading old "Hertz VS" threads and KHA chimed in and said something along the lines of the old Esks were ****** but the new ones are comparable to what the old HSKs sounded like.I had the orange cones. Honestly I thought they where good till I swapped them out.
Never had the old HSKs but I'm going Mille soonOld versions are extremely sub-par compared to the new versions. I was reading old "Hertz VS" threads and KHA chimed in and said something along the lines of the old Esks were ****** but the new ones are comparable to what the old HSKs sounded like.
What made you decide to go mille. Ive heard they were a low-mid volume SQ driver. not something to keep up with a loud substage.Never had the old HSKs but I'm going Mille soon
Whoever said that never heard them. They are louder than the XLs but more neutral. Not as aggressive. I don't have a loud substage anyway.What made you decide to go mille. Ive heard they were a low-mid volume SQ driver. not something to keep up with a loud substage.
You do know 0db out sound is **** near impossible?i'm talking about normalized amplitude response which is the power specification as to what a speaker is going to do in-terms of output by power i mean acoustic output so 32hz@0db