Kid at school selling 2 13w7's for 600 for both

Well I would hope Fi has more SPL titles than JL does, they make an SPL oriented woofer and JL doesn't. I actually think that the guys over at JL would smile if they heard you say that, because they don't want their products in fart box SPL installs.
There are SQ competitors out there running JL gear, and some have won using it. You seem pretty knowledgable about car audio, so I don't know why you don't understand that the install is going to determine the outcome of the sound quality.

JL has nothing to prove. And I still don't think they are overpriced....expensive, yes, but you get what you pay for in this day and age.
Install has everything to do with it. But why not start with the best that you can and work up? People win with JL...but you dont see the ones that win competiton after competition running JL. JL has a good base but there will ALWAYS be better. There is better than the comapnies that the best SQ compeditors are running. To brake it down you could be running electrostatic speakers which is one of hte most directional technologies to date.

And JL may not want to be winning SPL competitions. But their dealers sure act like they do. In fact the Sound Citation Wagon from the local JL dealer is an SPL bassed vehicle. 52 w0 10's and he can only manage a 158 on the AC. Good stuff there. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif He acts like that is the greatest vehile in north florida. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/rolleyes.gif.c1fef805e9d1464d377451cd5bc18bfb.gif

 
Agreed.



In what aspect does the w7 outperform the SI Mag? The effiency different is so minute it isnt worth mentioning, displacement capeability differences are almost negligible, the Mag can handle more power, and IMO the Mag sounds better. All things equal (never are in the real world, but hypothetical) the Mag has the output advantage ported (power not being a limiting factor) and they are about the same sealed. In fact Loyd's testing showed they have near equal output capeabilities. Between the 13" and the Mag 15" the Mag wins hands down in the output department.

Agian I will say the w7 is a great woofer...but I've had bad luck with the larger two and the price tag isnt worth it IMO. It doesnt get much better than the Mag in the SQ department and if you need more output the w7 isnt your woofer as it wasnt built for shear output. Neither was the Mag. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif
Dude get off the W7s nads, its a 4 year old woofer thats still top of the line in the SQL department. Everyone keeps saying there are much better, define much better... thats right you can't. Theres really not a lot of woofers that can hang with the W7 for what its meant to do. There are some that are close, but they still haven't been able to truly embarrass it... it holds its own... every time. You can throw out all these bogus claims that the Mag handles more power, etc. but you haven't done the testing to prove it. Not to mention you avoid all the W7s advantages such as its suspension capabilities vs the Mag. You are just biased and spewing nonsense. Furthermore, you throw price tag into the mix. Its not hard at ALL to get a 12W7 authorized for around $450. The Mag doesn't even beat it in value...

Don't think I'm insulting the Mag in anyway, I JUST bought one from the group buy because the value at that price actually did make it unbeatable. Its just that you keep talking up the Mag like its God's gift to the world while bashing the W7 for no reason. They are really two subs with similar output and SQ capabilities that sell for around the same price. Some prefer one, some prefer the other. Stop wasting your time talking up your sub against the W7, it just makes me respect the W7 more.

/rant

 
Dude get off the W7s nads, its a 4 year old woofer thats still top of the line in the SQL department. Everyone keeps saying there are much better, define much better... thats right you can't. Theres really not a lot of woofers that can hang with the W7 for what its meant to do. There are some that are close, but they still haven't been able to truly embarrass it... it holds its own... every time. You can throw out all these bogus claims that the Mag handles more power, etc. but you haven't done the testing to prove it. Not to mention you avoid all the W7s advantages such as its suspension capabilities vs the Mag. You are just biased and spewing nonsense. Furthermore, you throw price tag into the mix. Its not hard at ALL to get a 12W7 authorized for around $450. The Mag doesn't even beat it in value...
Don't think I'm insulting the Mag in anyway, I JUST bought one from the group buy because the value at that price actually did make it unbeatable. Its just that you keep talking up the Mag like its God's gift to the world while bashing the W7 for no reason. They are really two subs with similar output and SQ capabilities that sell for around the same price. Some prefer one, some prefer the other. Stop wasting your time talking up your sub against the W7, it just makes me respect the W7 more.

/rant
You said exactly what I was trying to say here....good wording. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/biggrin.gif.d71a5d36fcbab170f2364c9f2e3946cb.gif

After looking through the 12 challenge, I must say that the W7 impressed me quite a bit. Especially knowing how good it sounds in real life too.

Not one sub in there could be called "more impressive" than the W7 if you look at the numbers collectively. The W7 hung with the BTL (SPL wise) which was running on twice the power.

My point is exactly what Hundreth stated in his post. After 4 years on the market, the W7 still holds its own and is even better in certain respects (just as it's competitors are to it in some categories).

I didn't want to keep this post going, I just like to chat too much sometimes...but I will stop griping about this now.

 
Not one sub in there could be called "more impressive" than the W7 if you look at the numbers collectively.
lol its a good woofer, but quit trying to assure your self that its the best thing out there.//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif

 
lol its a good woofer, but quit trying to assure your self that its the best thing out there.//content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/laugh.gif.48439b2acf2cfca21620f01e7f77d1e4.gif
Reading comprehension > you. What you quoted in your post goes for all the subs in there....there really was no stand out performer.

Please tell me where I said it's the best ever. Otherwise, shut up.

 
Dude get off the W7s nads, its a 4 year old woofer thats still top of the line in the SQL department. Everyone keeps saying there are much better, define much better... thats right you can't. Theres really not a lot of woofers that can hang with the W7 for what its meant to do. There are some that are close, but they still haven't been able to truly embarrass it... it holds its own... every time. You can throw out all these bogus claims that the Mag handles more power, etc. but you haven't done the testing to prove it. Not to mention you avoid all the W7s advantages such as its suspension capabilities vs the Mag. You are just biased and spewing nonsense. Furthermore, you throw price tag into the mix. Its not hard at ALL to get a 12W7 authorized for around $450. The Mag doesn't even beat it in value...
Don't think I'm insulting the Mag in anyway, I JUST bought one from the group buy because the value at that price actually did make it unbeatable. Its just that you keep talking up the Mag like its God's gift to the world while bashing the W7 for no reason. They are really two subs with similar output and SQ capabilities that sell for around the same price. Some prefer one, some prefer the other. Stop wasting your time talking up your sub against the W7, it just makes me respect the W7 more.

/rant

Way to make it go from a civil discussion to an "omfg gtfo it roxors!11!1!11"

As for your statements.

1.) The mag CAN handle more power. Give a w7 12 1600w RMS...sub go poof. Give a mag 1600w and it sure as hell wont like it but it will keep alive for a good while before it go poof.

2.) The w7's suspension advantages are moot if the motor can push it far enough to take advantage of the suspension. The Mag will suffer from Vas Power compression sooner but both woofers will meet Bl power compression long before Vas power compression becomes a huge deal.

3.) Show me a Mag 12 for $450 authorized through JL with a JL warranty. Buying one from a reputable unauthroized dealer will cost you upwards of $600.

http://www.onlinecarstereo.com/CarAudio/ProductDetail.aspx?ProductID=12043

4.) I never said the Mag was some tyle of holy woofer. There are better and I am not denying that. But in that price range I think it is the best all around bang for buck. In the w7's price range it isnt the best bang for buck and that is for sure. There are plenty of woofers I'd rather try out in the w7's price range but simply dont have the money.

5.) I do have testing to back up my claims. Not only do I own two Mag 15's but I've had my hand in a few w7 installs and heard a few others as well.

6.) I never said the w7 was a bad woofer. I said the w7 isnt worth the money IMO and there are better for less. Not so much better. Better. Better to my ears, a little louder for the Mic, can handle a little more power. Better. That defines better. You can have two great runners but one can have a little better form and run a couple seconds faster in the 400. Who is the coach going to choose to run the 400 at state? The slightly better runner.

7.) What exactly did JL design the woofer to do. Some people claim it to be the pinnacle of SQ woofers. Other call it the loudest woofer on the market. Dealers call it the shiznit. I call it a good woofer with a good design which I've had a bad experence with and whose price tag I do not agree with.

You said exactly what I was trying to say here....good wording.
After looking through the 12 challenge, I must say that the W7 impressed me quite a bit. Especially knowing how good it sounds in real life too.

Not one sub in there could be called "more impressive" than the W7 if you look at the numbers collectively. The W7 hung with the BTL (SPL wise) which was running on twice the power.

My point is exactly what Hundreth stated in his post. After 4 years on the market, the W7 still holds its own and is even better in certain respects (just as it's competitors are to it in some categories).

I didn't want to keep this post going, I just like to chat too much sometimes...but I will stop griping about this now.
How long has the MT been on the market? XXX? Brahma? Point and case right there.

In the end JL has something that will always be backed by people like you. I do not mean that in an insulting way at all. You obviously love your w7 and nothign is going to change your mind. I have no problem with that nor is there anything wrong with that. There are Brahma MKI lovers and there are Round SoloX lovers.

I feel if this discussion carries any further it will turn into a shit storm. Not from you or myself but from others who like to jump on people with out reading the whole discussion. So I'm ending it now.

My offer still stands with the Mag. //content.invisioncic.com/y282845/emoticons/smile.gif.1ebc41e1811405b213edfc4622c41e27.gif

 
Why is power handling even an issue? Who cares which one will take more watts before the coil melts. What's that have to do with actual sonic performance? Or, are you all mistakenly equating power handing to output?

Speaker A maintains a certain amount of air displacement given 100 watts input power. Speaker B also maintains the same output, but with 1000 watts input power. Both are working at or near their potential maximum. Which is 'better'? Which would you rather use?

 
Why is power handling even an issue? Who cares which one will take more watts before the coil melts. What's that have to do with actual sonic performance? Or, are you all mistakenly equating power handing to output?
Speaker A maintains a certain amount of air displacement given 100 watts input power. Speaker B also maintains the same output, but with 1000 watts input power. Both are working at or near their potential maximum. Which is 'better'? Which would you rather use?
man i like your thinking. on another note, the w7 is a great sub no matter what anyone says. worth the money? to some yes, to others no. i myself would not pay for it. but like its been said, i would put the w7 in the top 10 best subs out there all around period. sure there are spl subs that get louder for less $$$, and there are sq subs out there that sound better for less $$$, but for a sub that gets loud and sounds good, there is not a whole lot of subs out there that better the w7 in that aspect. sure there are some, but not alot. like i said for an all around sub you can not go wrong with a w7, but you COULD do better, even for less $$$. COULD being the operative word.

 
The simple fact that so many new subs are compared to the W7, even new ones coming out now, tells you its still at the top of its game. Everything else said is simply sour grapes. And this is coming from someone who is not particularly a JL fan.

And to the guy several pages back who said JL doesn't need to advertise via competing, you should have been around the lanes 10-15 years ago. That's exactly how/where JL made its name to begin with.

 
Lol if you went to a highschool around here and asked all you'd hear is sony
Not my high school. When I was in school, we ran Memphis, Xtant, PG, Alpine. I know at least 2 other people in my class of around 100 that had Memphis setups. My first system was all Memphis. Although my best friend did have a cheap Sony setup lol. Didn't sound too bad for what it was though. Correct setup can make almost anything sound good.

 
If you have the cash, pick them up. Just make sure you have them tested at a reputable audio shop first. You don't want to get burned. Mess with them, and if you decide they don't fit your tastes, sell them and get some different equipment.

 
Activity
No one is currently typing a reply...
Old Thread: Please note, there have been no replies in this thread for over 3 years!
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

About this thread

tank65

10+ year member
Senior VIP Member
Thread starter
tank65
Joined
Location
macomb. MI
Start date
Participants
Who Replied
Replies
109
Views
5,789
Last reply date
Last reply from
leonsv
IMG_20260516_193114554_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0
IMG_20260516_192955471_HDR.jpg

sherbanater

    May 16, 2026
  • 0
  • 0

New threads

Top