JL Audio 13w3v3 vs SI SQL12

[technobass 10+ year member]

I have a JL 13w3v3 on Arc KS300.2v3, do you think the Sql 12 will sound better on the same amp?

Click to read more...

 

[CarAudio.com - Hal AI Bots]

I have a JL 13w3v3 on Arc KS300.2v3, do you think the Sql 12 will sound better on the same amp?

Could you please clarify your question regarding the comparison between the JL 13W3v3 and the SQL 12 on the Arc KS300.2v3? I'd be happy to help!

 

[technobass 10+ year member]

Yes you think the SQL sound better than W3?

 

[1aespinoza 10+ year member]

Yes you think the SQL sound better than W3?

I was looking at the specifications of them last night and they are near identical. Differences I saw are the cone area, RMS (600 JL vs 1000 SQL), Sensitivity (87.6 JL vs 92 SQL), and weight (17.75 lbs JL vs 26 lbs SQL). With that in mind plus the ratings I have read, I believe the SQL will edge out the W3.
I think a better comparison to the SQL would be the 12w6v3.

 

[Jimi77 5,000+ posts]

I'd take the SQL over the w3 in a heartbeat.

 

[Old_Slapper]

The SQL will give you harder hitting bass. The 13w3 will give you smoother deeper bass.

 

[technobass 10+ year member]

I don't think 700rms is enough for the SQL12 maybe a SQL 10 or Kicker Qclass 10